Dismissed
Sarjerao Mahadeo Patil and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCPIL/48/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Civil…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Civil Appellate Side
PIL No. 48 of 2005
1. Mr.Sarjerao Mahadeo Patil
and another ..Petitioners
vs.
1. The State of Maharashtra and
others ..Respondents
Shri Prashant P.Jadhav for petitioner.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR C.J.
& S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.
7th JUNE, 2007
P.C.
. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners prays for
grant of further time to file rejoinder. We see no reason
to grant further time to the petitioners.
2. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit
which have gone unrebutted and statement made on behalf of
the petitioners that the counsel has no instructions, we
dismiss this petition for non prosecution leaving the
parties to bear their own costs.
( CHIEF JUSTICE )
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J.)
Mr. Sarjerao Mahadeo Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court