The petition was dismissed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court as there was no need for any further direction following compliance with a previous division bench order in Writ Petition No. 12 of 2005 regarding law and order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 23 OF 2007
Shri Ayub Shaikh.. ... ... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors....... Respondents.
Mr.M.S.Karnik for the Petitioner.
Mr. S.K.Nair for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
Ms.Sandhya Iyer i/by M/s.Wadia Gandhy & Co.,
for Respondent No.5.
Mr. G.S.Godbole with Mr. R.D.Suryawanshi
for Respondent No.6.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATED : 13TH JUNE, 2007.
P.C.:
Having heard the learned Counsel for the parties
and particularly in view of the statement made by the
learned Counsel appearing for the State of Maharashtra
that they will comply with the observations and the
directions given in the orders passed by the Division
Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No. 12 of 2005
and would ensure that the law and order position is
maintained in the airport area, nothing survives in
this petition. This petition is, accordingly,
dismissed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
-: 2 :-
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition No. 12 of 2005Referred¶13
Shri Ayub Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
And Ors
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court