Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a pending suit; no representation appeared for the petitioner on successive dates, and the High Court dismissed the revision for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010689212014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 840/2014
Between:
Vadranam Venkata Subbamma
...PETITIONER
AND
Ravi Venkateswara Rao and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.SREENIVASA RAO VELIVELA
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.840 of 2014
ORDER:
3. The Civil Revision Petition is therefore dismissed for nonprosecution.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 18.09.2024
IS
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.840 of 2014
Date: 18.09.2024
IS
Vadranam Venkata Subbamma
Ravi Venkateswara Rao and Others
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
