Disposed

P N Rao, E.G.Dist v. Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, E.G.Dist and Anr.

Andhra Pradesh HC16 Sept 2024CRP/1776/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of two civil revision petitions filed against interlocutory orders in a Trust O.P. The court recorded that the respondents had filed a subsequent suit and the petitioner requested no further orders in the revisions with liberty to object in that suit.

What did the court decide?

The civil revision petitions were disposed of; liberty granted to raise legal objections in the subsequent suit filed by respondents.

P N Rao, E.G.Dist Vs Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara… — Property and Title | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶2

IS
(/)
o ;

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1776 X 14«ci r.F onic

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1776 OF 2016:

¶7

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order in I.A.NO. 3891 of 2014 in Trust O.P.No. 593 of 2014, dated 09-112015 on the file of the Court of the District Judge, Rajahmundry,

¶8

Between:

¶9

Putta Narayana Rao, S/o. late Venkanna aged 57 years, business D. No. 11-4-8, Agraharam Street, Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

¶10

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶11

AND

¶12

Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, S/o.late Ramarao, Hindu,

¶13

aged 53 years. Cultivation, R/o.Mandapeta, E.G.Dist.

¶14

Inapakolla Ramakrishna Chowdary, S/o.Krishnarao Hindu, aged 43 years. Cultivation, Mandapeta, E.G.Dist.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶16

Counsel for the Petltioner:SRI T V JAGGI REDDY

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T V S PRABHAKARA RAO

¶18

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1489 OF 2016:

¶19

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Order in I.A.NO. 614 OF 2015 in Trust, O.P.No. 593 of 2014, dated 20-82015 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Rajamundry, Between:

¶20

Putta Narayana Rao,S/o. late Venkanna, aged 57 years, business, D.No.11-4-8, Agraharam Street, Mandapeta, East Godavari District.

¶21

...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT

¶22

AND

¶23

Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, S/o.late Ramarao, Hindu, aged 53 years. Cultivation, R/o.Mandapeta, E.G.Dist.

¶24

Inapakolla Ramakrishna Chowdary, S/o.Krishnarao, Hindu, aged 43 years. Cultivation, Mandapeta, E.G.Dist.

¶25

...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶26

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fCRPMP. NO: 1885 OF 20161

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 20.08.2015 in lA NO.614 of 2015 in Trust OP NO.593 of 2014 on the file of the court of the Principal District Jduge, Rajahmundry, pending disposal of the above revision.

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI T V JAGGI REDDY

¶29

Counsel for the Respondents: —

¶30

The Court made the following:

¶31

APHC010526602016

¶32

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶33

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶34

PRESENT

¶35

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1776/2016

¶36

Between:

¶37

P N Rao, East Godavari District, ...PETITIONER

¶38

AND

¶39

Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad E G Dist and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

¶40

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶41

1.TV JAGGI REDDY

¶42

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶43

T V S PRABHAKARA RAO

¶44

Between:

¶45

P N Rao, East Godavari District. ...PETITIONER

¶46

AND

¶47

Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, East Godavari Dist. ...RESPONDENT(S) & Others

¶48

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶49

1.TV JAGGI REDDY

¶50

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶51

¶52

The Court made the following:

¶53

¶54

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NOs.1776 & 1489 of 2016

¶55

COMMON ORDER:

¶56

These Revisions are filed against the interlocutory orders dated 09.11.2015 passed in I.A.Nos.3891 of 2014 & 614 of 2015 respectively in Trust O.P.No.593 of 2014 by the District Judge, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner that subsequently a suit was filed by the respondents and the same is pending. He further submits that in view of the subsequent developments, no further orders are required to be passed in these Revisions, but sought liberty to raise legal grounds in the subsequent suit.

¶57

Recording the said submission, the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to raise all his legal objections in the subsequent suit said to have been filed by the respondents.

¶58

There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶59

//TRUE COPY//

¶60

SD/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT, REGISTRAR SE OFFICER

¶61

To,

¶62

The Principal District Judge, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District(with records if any)

¶63

One CC to SRI. T. V. JAGGI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶64

One CC to SRI. T.V.S. PRABHAKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶65

One CC to the Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravati.

¶66

Three C.D.Copies nm

¶67

¶68

¶69

HIGH COURT DATED: 17/09/2024

¶70

COMMON ORDER

¶71

CRP.No.1776 & 1489 of 2016

¶72

/X 2 2 NOV 20?<i
\o
^ ^ Current Sectron *

¶73

DISPOSING THE CRPs WITHOUT COSTS

P N Rao, E.G.Dist v. Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, E.G.Dist and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P N Rao, E.G.Dist v. Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, E.G.Dist and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Peyyala Sudhakar Vs Dara Bhagyaveni

Pinninti Ramakrishna, Vs Miriyala Hanumanthu

Mohammad Khaleel Vs Idgah Mohalla

Pandranki Parvathi Vs Thondarapu Lakshmi

Malireddi Sudarshan Reddy , Vs Malireddi Ramakrishna Reddy

Komma Jayamma Vs Komma Yellaiah and Another