Civil revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner, through proxy counsel, stated she was not interested in prosecuting the litigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010557592018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3460]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4465/2018
Between:
Smt. Pedada Satyanarayanamma ...PETITIONER
AND
Smt V Andalamma and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M CHALAPATI RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2.S R SANKU AND KAVITI MURALI KRISHNA
The Court made the following:
2
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4465 of 2018
ORDER:
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J
Date: 18.09.2024
IS
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.4465 of 2018
Date: 18.09.2024
IS
Smt. Pedada Satyanarayanamma
Smt V Andalamma and Others
NYAPATHY VIJAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
