Dismissed

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju v. Smt. Vegesna Uma Ramani Anuradha at Anuradha

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Sept 2024CRP/3197/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil Revision Petition No. 3197 of 2013 filed by the decree holder challenging an order of the Additional Family Court. The High Court observed that there was no representation made by either side despite the matter dating back to 2013. Consequently, the Court duly disposed of the petition by dismissing it for lack of prosecution without awarding any costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju Vs Smt… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

'X
if)

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶6

CjVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3197 OF 2013

¶7

Petition under Section 115 of CPC., aggrieved by the order dt. 24-52013 passed in EP No. 34 of 2010 in GOP No. 1207/2009 on the file of the Judge, Addl. Family Court, Visakhapatnam

¶8

Between:

¶9

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju, S/o. Late Laskhmi Narasimha Raju aged 44 yrs, R/o. D.No. 9-11, r Plot No. 55, Sharmasakthi Nagar Chinamushidiwada, Visakhapatnam.

¶10

...Petitioner/(Petitioner/ Decree Holder)

¶11

AND

¶12

Smt. Vegesna Uma Ramani Anuradha @ Anuradha, W/o. V.Madhusudhana Raju, aged 41 yrs, R/o. D.No. 50-13-17, Rayudu Pydithalli Nilayam, Seethammapeta, Visakhapatnam-16.

¶13

...Respondent/(Respondent/

¶14

Judgment Debtor)

¶15

LA. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRPMP. NO: 4250 OF 2013)

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i in support of the petition, the High Court may be

¶17

« A

¶18

¶19

pleased to pass orders granting visitation rights to the Petitioner herein see the minor Child V.Lakshmi Karthik » who is the custody of the respondent, twice in a month, pending disposal of the main CRP. Courtsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA Counsel for the Respondent: SRI GOPALA KRISHNA KALANIDHI The Court made the following ORDER:

¶20

'A-

¶21

APHC010286792013

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460]

¶23

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶24

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶25

PRESENT

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶27

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3197/2013

¶28

Between:

¶29

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju

¶30

...PETITIONER

¶31

AND

¶32

Smt Vegesna Uma Ramani Anuradha Anuradha ...RESPONDENT

¶33

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶34

1.PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA

¶35

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶36

1.GOPALA KRISHNA KALANIDHI

¶37

The Court made the following:

¶38

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶39

CIVIL REVISION PETITION N0.3197 of 2013

¶40

ORDER:

¶41

The present Revision filed questioning the order dated 24.05.2013 in E.P.No.34 of 2010 in G.O.P.No.1207 of 2009 passed by the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam.

¶42

Though the matter is pertaining to the year 2013, no representation is made on both sides.

¶43

The Civil Revision Petition is therefore dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶44

There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

¶45

SD/- M PRABHAKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. (with records if any)

¶50

One CC to Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, Advocate [OPUC]

¶51

One CC to Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi, Advocate [OPUC]

¶52

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi.

5. Three CD Copies

Skm

sree

HIGH COURT DATED; 18/09/2024

¶57

1 - ♦l V * • i-i ‘V 4r V ■ t #• / % * ^Ir • •

¶58

ORDER

¶59

CRP.No.3197 of 2013

¶60

DISMISSING THE C.R.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju v. Smt. Vegesna Uma Ramani Anuradha at Anuradha

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vegesna Madhusudhana Raju v. Smt. Vegesna Uma Ramani Anuradha at Anuradha

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P N Rao, E.G.Dist Vs Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, E.G.Dist and Anr.

P N Rao, E.G.Dist Vs Inapakolla Satyanarayana Vara Prasad, E.G.Dist and Anr.

Mr.Kakarla Venkata Bharath Kumar Reddy Vs Mr. S.V. Madhava Reddy, I.P.S.

Vadranam Venkata Subbamma Vs Ravi Venkateswara Rao

Mohd.Ezazuddin Vs Mr.Md.Shabul Hussain and 3 Others

Smt. Pedada Satyanarayanamma Vs Smt. v. Andalamma