Disposed¶12

Rajendra Mohan Agarwal v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 May 2026NA529/2275/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; S. 529 BNSS; expeditious disposal of trial; six-month direction from production of certified copy; Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022; Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 & 3/4 of D.P. Act; P.S. Shahganj, District Agra; Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Agra; Prashant Mishra-I, J.; decided May 6, 2026; Rajendra Mohan Agarwal v. State of U.P. and Another.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to decide Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022 expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either side; application disposed of without notice to O.P. No. 2. ¶12

Rajendra Mohan Agarwal Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the trial court should be directed to decide Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022, pending since long before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Agra, expeditiously within a stipulated time.

¶8

Court's answer

Keeping in view the period of pendency, the trial court is directed to make all endeavour to decide Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022 expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either side.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2, as the order is innocuous; if O.P. No. 2 feels aggrieved, he may approach the Court.

¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Application under S. 529 BNSS by Rajendra Mohan Agarwal, father-in-law of opposite party no. 2, seeking expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022 (Smt. Shivali Agarwal Vs. Amodh Agarwal and others) under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 & 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Shahganj, District Agra, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Agra. Held (Prashant Mishra-I, J.): in view of the period of pendency, the trial court shall make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no legal hurdle, and without permitting undue adjournments to either side. The application was disposed of without issuing notice to O.P. No. 2 as an innocuous order, with liberty to O.P. No. 2 to approach the Court if aggrieved. The learned A.G.A. had no objection to expediting the matter.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2275 of 2026

¶3

Rajendra Mohan Agarwal

¶4

		.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Shashi Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 84

¶6

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶7

Heard Sri Shashi Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 10995 of 2022 (Smt. Shivali Agarwal Vs. Amodh Agarwal and others) under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 & 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Shahganj, District Agra pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IX, Agra, within stipulated time.

¶9

It is apprised by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant, Rajendra Mohan Agrawal is father-in-law of opposite party no. 2. He has further submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶11

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶12

With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No. 2 feels

¶13

NA529 No. 2275 of 2026

¶14

¶15

aggrieved, he may approach this Court.

¶16

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶17

May 6, 2026

¶18