Disposed¶14

Abhishek Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA529/1872/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 529 BNSS; application for expeditious disposal of criminal trial; direction to decide within one year; no undue adjournments; Case No. 87503 of 2023; Case Crime No. 280 of 2022; Sections 498-A, 504, 323, 406 I.P.C.; Section 3/4 D.P. Act; P.S. Mahila Thana, District Ghaziabad; innocuous order; no notice to O.P. No. 2; Allahabad High Court; single judge (Prashant Mishra-I, J.).

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned trial court to decide Case No. 87503 of 2023 (State Vs. Abhishek Sharma) expeditiously, preferably within one year, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either side. ¶14

Abhishek Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 1872 of 2026

¶3

Versus Abhishek Sharma	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arjun Singh Sharma	Yadav, Gaurav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 84

¶5

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶6

List revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Arjun Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Case No. 87503 of 2023 (State Vs. Abhishek Sharma) arising out of Case Crime No. 280 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 504, 323, 406 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station-Mahila Thana, DistrictGhaziabad, within stipulated time.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶11

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from today, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶12

NA529 No. 1872 of 2026

¶13

¶14

With the above directions, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No. 2 feels aggrieved, she may approach this Court.

¶15

May 5, 2026

¶16

A. Mandhani

¶17

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Abhishek Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek Sharma v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Kharwar Kamkar vs State of U.P.

Pratibha Kumari vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Yadav vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shila Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Reema Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Qaadir and 8 Others Vs State of U.P.