Disposed¶13

Kanchan Bharti v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA529/2239/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedited-trial direction under Section 529 BNSS; Allahabad High Court directs ACJM, Court No. 5, Prayagraj to decide Complaint Case No. 2432 of 2023 (offences under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506 & 406 IPC, P.S. Jhunsi) preferably within one year; no legal hurdle caveat; bar on undue adjournments; application disposed without notice to O.P. No. 2; decision dated May 5, 2026; single bench of Prashant Mishra-I, J.; no precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court below (Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 5, Prayagraj) to decide Complaint Case No. 2432 of 2023 expeditiously, preferably within one year, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either side. ¶13

Kanchan Bharti Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2239 of 2026

¶3

Kanchan Bharti

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Gyanedra Pratap Singh, Manish Prajapati : G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 84

¶7

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶8

Heard Sri Manish Prajapati, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 2432 of 2023, (Kanchan Bharti Vs. Vijay Kumar Nishad) under Sections 419, 420, 323, 504, 506 & Section 406 of I.P.C., P.S. Jhunsi, District Prayagraj, pending in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 5, Prayagraj, within stipulated time.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶12

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that court below shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from today, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶13

With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. Nos. 2 feels aggrieved, he may approach this Court.

¶14

May 5, 2026

¶15

A. Mandhani

¶16

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kanchan Bharti v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanchan Bharti v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Kharwar Kamkar vs State of U.P.

Pratibha Kumari vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Yadav vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shila Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Reema Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Qaadir and 8 Others Vs State of U.P.