Disposed¶16

Suman Mishra v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA529/2241/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Speedy trial / expedition direction under S. 529 BNSS; one-year timeline fixed for decision of Criminal Case No. 2226 of 2011 (State Vs. Dilip Kumar Mishra and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. C-38 of 2005, Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504 & 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Baksha, District Jaunpur; bar on undue adjournments; disposal without notice to opposite parties nos. 2 to 6; A.G.A. conceded expedition; decided May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court below to decide Criminal Case No. 2226 of 2011 expeditiously, preferably within one year, without permitting undue adjournments to either side; application disposed of without notice to O.P. Nos. 2 to 6. ¶16

Suman Mishra Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2241 of 2026

Suman Mishra

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 5 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ranjeet Verma, Vindeshwari Prasad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 84

¶10

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶11

Heard Sri Vindeshwari Prasad, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that learned trial court be directed to decide the Criminal Case No. 2226 of 2011, (State Vs. Dilip Kumar Mishra and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. C-38 of 2005 under Sections 498-A, 406, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Baksha, District Jaunpur pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) F.T.C., Jaunpur within stipulated time.

¶13

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶15

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that court below shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from today, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶16

With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. Nos. 2 to 6 feel aggrieved, they may approach this Court.

¶17

May 5, 2026 A. Mandhani

¶18

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Suman Mishra v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suman Mishra v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vijay Kharwar Kamkar vs State of U.P.

Pratibha Kumari vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Yadav vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Shila Devi and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Reema Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Qaadir and 8 Others Vs State of U.P.