Disposed¶13

Deepika Rao v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026NA529/2251/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal of trial; application under Section 529 BNSS; S.T. No. 439 of 2025 (State Vs. Atul Kumar and others); Crime No. 161 of 2024; Sections 376, 328, 504, 506 IPC; P.S. Phoolpur, District Prayagraj; A.D.J./F.T.C.-I Prayagraj; direction to decide preferably within one year from production of certified copy; no unnecessary adjournments; Allahabad High Court; Prashant Mishra-I, J.; disposed of on May 6, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of with a direction to the trial court to decide S.T. No. 439 of 2025 expeditiously, preferably within one year from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either party. ¶13

Deepika Rao vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2251 of 2026

¶2

Deepika Rao	.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 4 Others	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vimal Srivastava
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶3

Court No. - 84

¶4

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of S.T. No. 439 of 2025 (State Vs. Atul Kumar and others), arising out of Crime No. 161 of 2024, under Sections 376, 328, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Phoolpur, District Prayagraj, pending in the court of A.D.J./F.T.C.-I, Prayagraj, within stipulated time.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant apprised this Court that the aforesaid case is pending since 2025 before the concerned trial court and the same has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. states that no useful purpose would be served in issuing notice to opposite party Nos. 2 to 5 and he has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶9

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the

¶10

NA529 No. 2251 of 2026

¶11

¶12

case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶13

With the aforesaid direction, the instant application is disposed of .

¶14

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶15

May 6, 2026 Kashifa

¶16

Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Deepika Rao v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepika Rao v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dhanveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chakradhari Yadav Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Bhanu Priya Dubey Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Karmveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Dhanveer Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt Krishna Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and Another