Smt Krishna Jaiswal v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC6 May 2026NA529/2134/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Speedy trial / expedition direction; application under S. 529 BNSS; Allahabad High Court; trial pending before Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria in Case No. 1827 of 2018 (State of U.P. v. Satya Narayan); Case Crime No. 59 of 2017; Sections 420, 406 IPC; Sections 318(4), 316 BNS; Police Station Kotwali, District Deoria; one-year timeline from certified copy; no undue adjournments; disposed without notice to opposite party no. 2; A.G.A. no objection.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court (Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria) to decide Case No. 1827 of 2018 expeditiously, preferably within one year from production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either side; application disposed without notice to O.P. No. 2. ¶¶11

Smt Krishna Jaiswal vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2134 of 2026

¶3

Smt Krishna Jaiswal

¶4

	Versus	.....Ap	plicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another		.....	Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Upadhyay Rajvanshi : G.A.	Karan Dinanath,	Vishesh

¶5

Court No. - 84

¶6

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶7

Heard Ms. Pooja, learned Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vishesh Rajvanshi, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶8

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to direct the trial Court to conclude the trial expeditiously pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoria bearing Case No.1827 of 2018 (State of U.P. versus Satya Narayan) arising out of Case Crime No.59 of 2017 under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC [under Sections 318(4) and 316 of BNS] registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Deoria.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶11

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶12

With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No. 2 feels

¶13

NA529 No. 2134 of 2026

¶14

¶15

aggrieved, he may approach this Court.

¶16

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶17

May 6, 2026

¶18

Saurabh

¶19