Arati Rani Roy and Ors. v. Santanu Kumar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order closing contempt petitions as impugned decisions were complied with by respondents, discharging them.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petitions closed; respondents discharged.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Cont. Cas(C) No.20/2016
Sanjoy Biswas and others
----Petitioner(s)
Versus
Santanu Kumar and others
----Respondent(s)
Connected with
Cont. Cas(C) No.21/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.22/2016 Cont. Cas(C) No.23/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.24/2016 Cont. Cas(C) No.25/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.28/2016
For Petitioner (s) : Ms. S. Deb Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Raju Datta, Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJAY RASTOGI
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjoy Biswas and others
- respondent
Santanu Kumar and others
Coram
Ajay Rastogi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Tripura HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/25/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court