A contempt petition wherein the petitioner filed a submission of compliance stating that the order of the court has been complied with and the petitioner does not wish to press the petition. The State counsel extended the same submission; consequently, the petition was closed.
The contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont . Cas(C) No. 29/2017
B E F O R E
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. T. VAIPHEI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
Present:
For the petitioner : Mr. S. M. Chakraborty, Sr. Advocate. Ms. P. Sen, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. D. C. Nath, State Counsel.
06.09.2017.
It is stated by Mr. S. M. Chakraborty, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that the order of this Court has now been complied with and the petitioner does not wish to press this contempt petition.
The submission of Mr. D. C. Nath, the learned State
counsel also extended to the same footing.
Resultantly, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
d.dey.
Cont . Cas(C) No. 29/2017 Page 1 of 1
Cont. Petitioner
State
T. VAIPHEI
S. TALAPATRA
D. DEY
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
