The court observed that respondents complied with an earlier judgment, thereby closing connected contempt petitions and discharging the respondents.
Contempt petitions closed; respondents discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Cont. Cas(C) No.20/2016
Sanjoy Biswas and others
----Petitioner(s)
Versus
Santanu Kumar and others
----Respondent(s)
Connected with
Cont. Cas(C) No.21/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.22/2016 Cont. Cas(C) No.23/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.24/2016 Cont. Cas(C) No.25/2016, Cont. Cas(C) No.28/2016
For Petitioner (s) : Ms. S. Deb Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Bhowmik, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Raju Datta, Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJAY RASTOGI
Order
25/06/2018
Counsel for the petitioners submits that after filing of the contempt petitions judgment of this court in reference to which contempt petitions have been filed has been duly complied with by the respondents in letter and spirit.
In view of this development, these contempt petitions are closed and respondents stand discharged.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Pulak
Sanjoy Biswas and others
Santanu Kumar and others
Ajay Rastogi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
