Disposed
Sankar Debnath and Ors. v. Raval H Kumar
Tripura HCCont.Cas(C)/38/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
or Advocate Serial No. Date Office notes…
What the court decided
AI extract
or Advocate Serial No. Date Office notes…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Noting by Officer or Advocate |
Serial No. Saikat |
Date | Office notes, reports, orders or proceedings With signature CONT CAS(C) 38 of 2017 B E F O R E THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA 17.08.2017 Mr. DK Das Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has submitted that in view of the disclosure made in the reply, the petitioner would not like to proceed further with this petition. Accordingly, this petition stands closed. Notice on the respondent stands discharged. Mr. TD Majumder, learned counsel appears for the sole respondent. JUDGE |
|---|
Saikat
respondent
S. Talapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court