Syeda Aijaz Fathima v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court (Special Original Jurisdiction), WP.No.41126 of 2016, order dated 19-09-2025 by J Sreenivas Rao J: writ petition by accused Nos. 3-11 seeking quashing of Crime/FIR No. 677 of 2016 dated 16-11-2016 (Women Police Station, DD, Hyderabad; Sections 49a-A & 406 IPC; Sections 4 & 6 Dowry Prohibition Act 1961) was CLOSED — charge sheet filed only against accused Nos. 1 and 2 before XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, cause held not to survive adjudication; no costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed. Interim stay dated 28-11-2016 (WP.Mp.No. 50663 of 2016); respondent No. 3 Sveda Amena @ Ameena Khusro had moved (M.P. No. 867 of 2017 / I.A. No. 1 of 2017, S.151 CPC) to vacate it. Counsel: Shaik Saifullah (petitioners); B. Sridhar, AGP for Home (Respondents 1 & 2); K. Durga Prasad and K. Anurag (Respondent No. 3).
What did the court decide?
That, in view of the submission that during the pendency of the writ petition the Investigating Officer filed charge sheet before the XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad against accused Nos. 1 and 2 only, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication.