Smt. Pallakonda Aruna Vs Maddela Govardhan

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE^{NINETEENTHDAYOF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVASRAO}

¶6

crvl REVISI NP ETITION^{NO:31030F 2025}

¶7

Petition under^{pfticle 227 of the constitutionof lndiaaggrieved by the o-rder} dated08.07.2025Passedinl.A.No.35of2025ino.S.No.43ot2025onthefileof G" borrt of the^{Sub-DivisionalMagistrate and Special AssistantAgent to} Government,^{MobileCourt at Bhadrachalam'}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Smt. Pallakonda^{Aruna, W/o.Srinivas,aged 36 years'Occ: Hous-ewife' R/o'} il.'iio. i- a5; Desnaraluiaitv^{Vitr-g"' ximaEp'rMairdal' Karimnagar District'}

¶10

...Petitioner/Plaintiff

¶11

AND

¶12

Maddela Govardhan,^{S/o. Ramulu, aged} QQ^{years,.O. cc.Business'Fl/oH' No'} T;","dff C;;p,^{cnr nit rp"tt} v^{,,ania l, B hidrad ri Koth as ude m District'}

¶13

..RespondenUDefendant

¶14

IANO: 1 OF²⁰²⁵

¶15

PetitionunderSectionl5lofCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstated in the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petiiion, the HighCourt may be pleased to} ;;;;a ";^{;;t"ndthe Temporary lnjunction restraining the RespondenVdefendant} irom interfering^{with the ,".p""tof petition schedule property i' e'} '^{AC. sheet} ,*i"J nor."^{b,-earingH. No. i- 2- 1l2E with appurtenantsite to an extentof 1o48.} sq ia" in^{Sy. No. 1713, Plot No. 6 and T formedin a single compact block} situated at^{VidyanagarColony, G' P'ChunchupallyMan!1t' Bhadradri} x-"tn"gro".^{District b5udeduyeAst:etottto.} !^{ani house site of Poorna; West:} n-"nJg Road;^{North: Plot No- 5 of Dr' ShankarNaik; South: Kaluva'pending} disposal of^{the above CRP.}

¶16

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶17

BETWEEN:

¶18

Maddela Govardhan, S/o. Ramulu,^{aged 56 years, Occ Busriness,R/o.H. No'} '1- 2, Babu Camp, Chunchupally Mandal, Bhadradri Kothag rdem District.

¶19

... Petitioner/RespondenUDefendant

¶20

AND

¶21

Smt. Pallakonda Aruna, W/o. Srinivas,^{aged36 years, Occ: Housewife,Rl/o.} H. No. 1- 35, Deshara.jupally Village,^{Kamalapur Mandal, KrlrimnagarDistrict}

¶22

... Responde nUPetitioner/Plaintiff

¶23

Petition under Section 151 of CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court rnay be pleasedto} Vacate the interim order dated 29.08.2025^{passedin l.A. No l of 2025 in C.R.P} No- 3103 of 2025 and to dismiss the above^{CRP, with exemplarycosts.}

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl V^{YADU KRISHNASAINATI{}

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent : MRS. M^KATYAYANI

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

ry

¶28

THE TION'BLE SRI JUSTTCE J, SR.EENTVAS^RAO CTVIL REVISION PETITION No.31O3 OF 2025

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This Civil Revision Petition is filed invoking^the provisions of Article 227 of Constitution of^Indla.

¶31

Heard Sri V.Yadu Krishna Sainath,^{learned counselfor} the petitioner and Mrs. M.^{Katyayani, learned counsel} appearing on behaif of respondent.

¶32

tearned counsel for the^{petitioner submits that} petitioner frled Suit O.S.No.43 of 2025^{on the frle of Sub-} Divisional Magistrate and Special^{Assistant Agentto} Government, Mobile Court,^{Bhadrachalam('SubDivisional} Magistrate' for brevity) for^{grant of perpetual injunction} restraining the respondent-defendant^{from interferingwith the} suit schedule property,^{along with the said suit, the petitioner} has filed application I.A.No.3S^{of 2025 for grant of temporar5r} injunction. In the said application,^{learnedSub-Divisional} Ivlagistrate granted temporar5r^{injunction on 08.07.2025 till} 19.08.2025. Even^{before expiryof the above said ad-interim} injunction, the petitioner hled^application on^18.08.2025

¶33

JSR, J C.R.P.No.3I03 OF 2025

¶34

2

¶35

seeking extension of the above said order. However no presiding officer or in-charge ofiicer was posted, due to which injunction granted in favour of the petitione- on 08.07.2025, could not be extended and in the above sairl circumstances, the petirioner approached this Court and fited present Civil Revision Petition invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of Constitution of India. This Court on 29.O8.2Ct25, while ordering Notice before arlmission, taking into conr;ideration the facts ald circumstances of the case ald also the submissions made by the learrLed counsel for petitioner granted interim injunction -estraining the respondent/ defendant from interfering wir.h the petition schedule property tlll 19.O9.2025.

¶36

Smt. M. Katyayani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent submits that during the pendency of this Civil Revision petition, Sub-Collector, Bhadracha_Iajal was given full additionai charge as Sub-Divisional Magistr:rte and Special Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile Court, Bhadracha_tam and the petitioner is entitled to approach the said Court seeking €:xtension of the injunction order wh:ch u,as granted

¶37

JSR, J C.R.P.No.3 r03 OF 2025

¶38

3

¶39

t

¶40

on 08.07.2025. Respondent has^already filed^counteralong with documents in I.A.No.35 of 2025^{seekingvacation of the} said order. She further submits that under the^{guise of ex-} parte irlttnction order, the petitioner is^proceeding with^the construction in the petition schedule^{property and she is not} entitled for extension of the interim^{injunction order.Hence,} the present revision petition liled^{by the petitioner is liable to} be dismissed.

¶41

l,earned counsel for the petitioner by^{way of reply} submitted that Court below may^{be directed to disposeof} I.A.No.35 of 2025, by frxing time^{limit and till such time the} interim injunction granted in favour^{of the petitioner may be} extended.

¶42

Having considered the rival^{submissionsmadeby} respective parties, this Court without^{expressing any vlew on} the merits of the case, on the^{groundthat I.A.No.3Sof 2025} filed by the petitioner is^{pending before the Sub-Divisional} Magistrate, and Sub-Collector, Bhadrachalam^{was given full} additional charge of Sub-Divisional^{Magistrateand Special} Assistant Agent to Government, Mobile^{Court, Bhadrachalam'} .\

¶43

JSR, J C.R P.No.3l03 OF 2025

¶44

4

¶45

a1

¶46

7 . Taking into consideration, the pecrrliar facts and circumstance of the case arld to render substantial justice to the parties, learned Sub-Collector, Bhadrachalam, is directed to dispose of the application namely I.A.No..lS of 2O2S adter giving opportunity to both the parties as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order arrd the parties are directed to cooperate with the Court below for disposal of the applicati,:n without seeking undue adjournrrrents. Till such time interim injunction order dated OB.OT.2O2S in I.A.No.35 of 2025 granted earlier shall stands extended.

¶47

B. With the above directions, the Civil Rer.ision petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶48

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed.

¶49

SD/. C DEEPIKA, SISTANT REGISTRAR.

¶50

//TRUE COPYII I \ SECTION OFFICER

¶51

To,

¶52