Writ petition questioning the registration and joinder of multiple FIRs was closed by the Court as the cause did not survive. The petitioner conceded that the matter had been settled and a final report was filed by the Investigating Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE J SREENIVAS RAO
' WRIT PETITION NO:6121 OF 2017
Between:
Thunga Nageswara Rao, P. Rama Krishna Reddy,, or Devineni Prasad Babu S/o Trimurthulu, Aged 40 years, Occ Business, F|/o Kadimipuntha Village, H/o Gamparru, Elamanchili Mandal, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue a Writ, or Order, or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in registering and continuing the F.l.R.s i.e. F.1.R.No.'123 of 2015 dt.12-3-2015 for the offences u/s 506, 509 and 385 of IPC on the file of 5th respondent and F.l.R.No.276 of 2015 dt.25-5-2015 for the offences uls448, 354(A), 354 (8), 380, 506 riw 34 IPC on the file of sth respondent and F.l.R.No.206 of 2015 dt.27-06-2015 for the alleged offences u/s 341, 354, 504,506r/w 34 IPC on the file of 6th respondent
on a report given by the 7th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and violation of Sec.219 and 22O of Criminal Procedure Code and consequently charged together and a single trial may be conducted.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 75'l4OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in F.l.R.No.123 of 2015 and F.l.R.No.276 of 20'15 on the file of 5th respondent and F.l.R.No.2OG of 2O15 dt.27-06-2015 on the file of the 6th respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.S.P.PRANEETH, rep.,SRl S.V.S.V.PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents No.lto6 : SRI B.SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME -- Counsel for the Respondents No.7 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6121 of 2017
ORDER:
\
ThiS Writ Petition has been filed questioning the action of respondents in registering and continuing FIR Nos.l23, 276 and206 of 2015 respectively.
2
Pending miscellaneous applications, ifany, shall stand closed.
SD/- K. BHAVANI SWAMY ISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER \
To,
BSK
PVL
w
HIGH COURT
DATE D: 1 810912025
ORDER
I
SiA €
()-J
2 4 lAtl 202$ tl:
-t
* 'rl
WP.No.6121 of 2017
CLOSING THE WRITPETITION WITHOUT COSTS
(;.4rol: \v--'4,'u
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Thunga Nageswara Rao
The State of Telangana
The Director General of Police, Telangana State
The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad at Basheerbagh
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Police, Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Saifabad Police Station
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
