Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in Crime No.169/2015 under Sections 406, 420, 468 IPC at Central Crime Station, Hyderabad. The court was informed that investigation concluded with a final report, cognizance taken as C.C.No.11408 of 2020, pending trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTHDAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23765 OF 201s
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedtherewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriatewrit, order or Direction, more particularly onein the nature of writof Mandamus, declaringthe actionof the Respondent No.2 in implicating thepetitioners as Accused in relationto crime No. 169/201 5 basing on the false complaintg]ven by the 3rd respondent as ogqS !!!999!, erltlgtyqE violative of Article21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the same
l.A. NO: 1OF2O1s(wPMP. NO: 30800 0F 2015)
.,..i.ix:.
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in tlre circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Co lrt may be pleasedto pass orders to direct the Respondent No.2 herein not'r arrestthe petitioner herein in relation to Cr.No.169/2015in view of the Ap< x Court directionsin Arnesh Kumar Vs. State ofBihar and another (2014) \ SCC 273' pending disposal of the main Writ Petition,in the interest of justice.
l.A. No: 1 OF 2016(vWMP. NQi405 oF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin th,: circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Co trt maybe pleasedto vacate the interim order dated 13-07-2015passed inW.P tI.P.No.30800of 2015 in W.P.No. 23765 ol 2015.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATASAI KRISHNA )ONNURU (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 2: SRISRIDHAR,Ar3 P FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Ms. D. SWETHA, REPII:SENTING SRI G. KALYAN CHAKRI."ARTHY
The Court made the following: ORDER
'1.' : .- . ,":t# .;-e
w
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.23765 OF 2015
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking to set aside the proceedings in Crime No.169 of 2Ol5 against the petitioners for the offences under Section 406, 42O and 468 of Indian Penal Code on the file of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad wherein the petitioners was arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2.
\ t
JSR, J W P.No.23765 OF 2015
2
during the pendency of the writ petition, , re Investigating Officer after conducting investigation filed fin Ll report on the hle of XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magist-ate, Hyderabad and the said court has taken cognizance arL, I the sarne was numbered as C.C.No.11408 of 2O2O and the s eme is pending. By virtue of the same, cause in the writ p:tition does not survive for further adjudication.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pend i rg in this writ
Petition shall stand closed.
SD/ M.JAWAHAR REDDY AI;;ISTANT REGISTRAR
(-:t-
//TRUE COPY//
To
SECTION OFFICER
2- Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the ltate of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
MP TKS NT
HIGH COURT
DA'l ED:1910912025
dr. '(HE SIe
I
/; :i
I i-)
a_
2 I JAN 2026
.I
:, /
Y
l.ru
$:-:i
ORDER
WP.Nc .23765 of 2015
CLOSING THE I VRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
A
tr ,.,!
G.'
0
,.!ffi
I
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging Crime No.169/2015 survives after filing of the final report and cognizance by the Magistrate.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R. Sudheer
Smt. T.V. Nagajayasree
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Station House Officer, CCS Police Station, Hyderabad
Gourav Agaruvalla
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
