Aishwarya Reddy Toom Vs The State of Telangana

Aishwarya Reddy^{Toom, Dio. T Puliven{er-f9O$y. aoed about 26 years'} Dee. Student, R/o.^{4001 airi"g'st , Api rs, er'itao<jlpniSPenns-ylvania-US'} il"oi"iii,ii.i''ov^Sp."iutpI*"? "i^{ntt;inev'holder'.who is the father of the} Princioal i.e.. T. Pulivena"I^{n""Oiy, il"i''t" Ananth.Readv aoed about 58} i,"'ri"'I?iJ""^{n"iii"i"i'.iii"'orii;;i,' {io ri'r'lo +or' suguna NravamRoad} cotony, Kajaguda,^{Gachibowli' Hyderabad} ilf ".+,'sIiv"inna,

¶15

...PETITIONER

¶16

AND

¶17

1 The State^{of Telangana,Rep by its PrincipalSecretary' HomeDepartment'} Secretariat,^HYderabad.

¶18

B

¶19

2 The Director^{of General of Police, Telanganastate,at. Saifabad' Hyderabad'}

¶20

a The Commissioner^{of Police' Cyberabad, at. Gachibowli, Hyderabad'}

¶21

4 The Deputy Commissioner^{of Police, tvladhapurDivision'at Cyberabad}

¶22

ti

¶23

5 TheStationHouseofficer,PoliceStationRaidurgam'AtRaidurgam'

¶24

El s/o late Md.^{lshagalr, Asedabo^ut 38} -vrs'^occ .Business' ;'#:lil, ii./;'H i'i;Hi:i)aorial, 'rh,^{v-5.r',rir.ixa' Raibiavan RoadHvderabad}

¶25

6

¶26

7 Sri Qhizer^{Bin Abu Baker,s/o late AbuBaker Bin Mohatnaged about 30} ;;;;:"?;;."'Brtin".i,^{nio H.rlo e--+ ie+r 14' ArunacolonvTowlichowkt'} Hyderabad.

¶27

B Palaboina^{Laxminarayana,S/o late Balaiah, Aged about'41 yrs occ.PvL} il;ffi; nj3' H. ru"li;+e^{ru rtnlng' vilt's", Pataicheruvu Mandal' Telangana} State.

¶28

c,

¶29

{"

¶30

9 Bhomamma,^{W/o [i/lallaiah, Occ Housewife,} {O9d^{aborrt 40 vrs R/o H No"l-} 3, Lakdrarn,^{lDA, Pasnavmlll"ar;i; ivl; #;!ieiiinchtt'uulrriandal' T S}

¶31

N/laniula, Wo.^{Shankar, aged about 28yrs'Occ Housewife'R/oHNo 6-2211'} Gan'digudem^{Colony, Sultanpur'Patancheruvu'I D}

¶32

1 1. Smt. P.^{Shoba,W/o Janqaiah,Aged about - 40 vrs Occ Housewife} R/o H No.6-1^{8, rvrutnang iViliX6ul' i5'i"nin"t"'trltanda[' Tela ngana state}

$

i +

nl

,} +,

G

6

$

:t +

Gangadar Rao, S/o Subba Rao, Aged about 44 yrs,⁽ )r. c Business, R/o. BlOt No.'1520-F, Rajarajeshwari Nagar, Kondapur, Hyderab:rr.

¶45

13.Gaddam Saibaba, S/o Gaddam Mallesh Aged about i), yrs, Occ. Business, R/o.Plot No.550-F, level-1 Aryans, Road No.92, Jubiler:l-, ll;, Hyderabad

¶46

14.Pochamma. Wo Ramulu. Aged about 48 yrs, Occ. Ho.rs:wife, R/o. H.No.6_1_ 486 l N 40, Mahabha rath Nagar, K hairtabad', Flyderabad

¶47

P. Srinivas, S/o late Jangaiah Aged about 43 yrs, I )cc. pvt. Emolovee. R/o.H.No.6-1-507 l1311O, lndirangar, Khairtabad, Hyberiri ad.

¶48

l6.Salamma, Wo. Sudershan Aged about 45 yrs, Occ. Hr: Lrse wife, R/ o.H.No.1_ 2-4Bl 1/Bl, Domalguda, Hyderabad.

¶49

17 P RgJu -QLo. late. Jangaiah, Aged about 41 yrs, Occ [:,v: Employee, R/ o. H No.6-1-507/ 9/ 15, lndiranagar, Khairtabad, Hyderabac

¶50

P Mallesham, S/o late Jangaiah, Aged about 40 yrs, )cc. pvt. Emplovee, R/o.H.No 2-29'1 , Jaya Ramnigar, euthabullapur, HyiJerrlrad

¶51

'19. P Laxmmama, Wo lale Jangaiah, Aged about 62 l, s, Occ. Housewife, R/o.H No.6-1-501', QR.No.44 FF, Mahabarath nagar, Kla rtabad, Hyderabad

¶52

20 4.l.lala R^a11{er^fle{Oy, S/o. Raji Reddy, Aged about 4t) yrs, Occ Business, Plot no.609, C-Block, S lV R. Viriay symfnoiy, Gachibo,r, t, Hyderabad

¶53

21 . Mohammed [,4iskeen, S/o Mohammed Moinuddin Age:c about 23 yrs, Occ. Busines, R/o H.No 6-3-7BOl21lA, Ameerpet, Hyderaba-d.

¶54

...RESPONDENTS

¶55

Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lnd : praying that in the circumstances stated n the affidavit filed therewith, the l-igh Court may be pleased to pass an order of writ of CERTIORARI by quar;h ng and calling the entire record in respect of final report dated 11.10.2019 r: FIR No.40gl2017 registered under CPC 420,406,506, 12O-B of the CpC befor:, espondent no.5 on a complaint of the petitioner and the said report is recenfl1, : btained under RTI Act on dt.08.09.2020 and 14.09.2020 and declare the samo :otalry agarnst law, violations of Principals of natural Justice, ultra virus, pror:e Jure contemplated under criminal^procedure code cPC and against the provis;rr:ns of Article^.14 of the Constrtution of lndia^'1 950.

¶56

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶57

Petrtion under Sectron^'151 CPC praying that in the c:^, ;umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High cour nay be pleased to direct the respondent no.5 to conduct the re-investigatio n as r: rntemplated under

.i +

f.

s

'I *+

q,

t {t

the Cr.P.C with regard to the FIR No.408/2017^{registered underIFC} 420,406,506, 12O-B of the lPC,^pending disposal of the main Writ^petition

¶66

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURESH SHIV SAGAR

¶67

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 5: SRI B.SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME

¶68

Counsel for the Respondent No.6 to 21: --

¶69

The Court made the following: ORDER

f-

!

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREIII\IIVAS RAO

¶74

WRIT PETITION No.19288 OF 2O2O

¶75

ORDER:

¶76

This u,rit petition is Iiled seeking tr: quash the 1-rna_l report dated 11.10.2019 of FIR No.408 of 2',i.tl7 submitted by respondent No.5 before the Court of XVI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajerr: -zrnagar.

¶77

Heard Sri Suresh Shiv Sagar, learneri counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assist,rnt Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of officja t respondents.

¶78

Learnerl counsel for the petitione:r submits that Investigating Officer without properly condur,r ng investigation and without giving opportunity to the petitior:er to produce the requisite documents filed final report in Crim,: No.40 g of 2OIT .

¶79

Per contra, learned Assistant Governlr:ent pleader for Home submits that the writ petition hled r the petitioner invoking the jurisdiction of this Court und,:r Articl e 226 of Constitution r:f India is not maintainable. Th,. tetitioner ought to have filed. protest petition before the o(. ncerned Court instead of fi1ing the present writ petition.

¶80

I

¶81

W.P.No,l92aa OF^2O2O

¶82

\ \t ..r+-'qd

¶83

2

¶84

\l

¶85

Learned counsel for the petitioner by^way of^reply submits that the petitioner^{may be grantedliberty to avail the} remedies as available under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure or Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,^2023.

¶86

Taking into consideration the above said^submissions made by respective parties without expressing^{any view on the} merits of the case, the petitioner is gralted^{liberty to avail the} remedies as available under Cr.P.C or^{BNSSin respect of Iinal} report submitted by the respondent No.S^{before ofXVI} Additional Metropolitan Magistrate,^Cyberabadat Rajendranagar.

¶87