This court dismissed a writ petition filed in 2018 challenging a temple shop auction held in 2018. The court held that the cause of action had expired due to the efflux of time as the judgment was delivered in 2025.
Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
I I i I I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD .-;
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE-,-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 33740 OF 2018
Between:
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI VIJAY ASHRIT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 : GP FORENDOWMENTS Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 : SRI K.JAGANMOHAN REDDY The Court made the following ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
I I ! rtt tl
\
WRIT PETITION No.3374O of 2Ol8
ORDER:
This writ petition is hled seeking the following relief:
'fo issue an appropiate Wit Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Wft of Mandamus declaring the auction of lea-se of 14 shops of the 4th respondent Temple conducted on 15.09.2018 bg deliberately not allouing tle Petitioners herein to participate in th-e said auction and denging them their right to bid for lease of tlre said shops ttith malaftde intention as being illegal, arbitrary and uiolatiue of ArticLes 14, 21 and 3OO-A of tle Constitution of India and os also ttte proui.sions of Leose Rules and consequentlg direct tlrc Respondents to conduct the lease of 14 sLtops of 4th respondent Temple afresh."
2 This matter relates to the auction of lease of 14 shops of
the 4th respondent-Temple.
counsel for the respondents
No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/.S.MALLT KARJUNARAO ISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUECOPYI/
I I
SECTTONOFFICER
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1710212025
ORDER
WP.No.33740 of 2018
1 IE ST n .te
,/,1.
i'..
| .t
i:l
1
0 JUN 2025
,'. t
\ D,:SPATC
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
Y
>
ry
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed in 2018 seeking declaration of illegal auction survives the cause of action before 2025 due to efflux of time.
N. Krishna
GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Sri K.Jagan Mohan Reddy
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
