Dismissed¶31

Dr.K Satish Kumar Reddy v. State of Ap,Prl.Scy,Medical,Hyd,and 3

Telangana HC17 Feb 2025WP/10737/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs; challenge to Circular Dt. 4.3.2014 of Returning Officer for DCI/APSDC Elections cancelling Dental Council of India election notification; prayed mandamus under Article 226 as contrary to Dentist Act 1948; elections per Gazette No. 300 dt. 19.12.2013 and Gazette No. 17 dt. 17.01.2014; interim application under Section 151 CPC to suspend circular; none appeared for petitioner; cause of action of 2014 election notification no longer survived; miscellaneous applications closed; Telangana High Court, Nagesh Bheemapaka J, 17.02.2025.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no costs. ¶31

Dr.K Satish Kumar Reddy Vs State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

i j i : i ! i I I i I I

¶2

I I I I II I..

¶3

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶4

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 10737 OF 2016

¶9

Between:

¶10

DR.K Satish Kumar Reddy, S/o. Dr. K. Sekhar Reddy, Aged about 54 years, Occ: Denlal Sergon RVo- Plot No. 83, Phase - l, Kambtap-uri Colony, Srinagai Colony, Hyderabad.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Department, Secretariat Building, Secretarial, Hyderbbad.

¶14

The Returning Officer for DCl, and APSDC Elections And Dlrector of Medical Education (Academic) Koti, Hyderabad.

¶15

The.Dental Council of lndia,, Aiwan-E-Galib lVarg, Kotl6 Road, New Delhi - 'l10 OO2, rep.by its Secretary.

¶16

The A.P. State Dental Council, Government Dental College, New Building, Afzalgunj, Hyderabad - 500 012, rep.by its Registrar.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Circular Dt. 4.3.2014 issued by 2nd respondent in canceling the election notification issued for the 3'd respondent National Body i.e., Dental Council of lndia as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and also contrary to the provrsion of the Dentist Act 1948 and set-askje the same and consequently direct the respondents to proceed with the conducting of elections to the 3rd respondent body as per Election Final Notification vide Gazett No. 300, Dt. 19.12.2O13 and Gazett No. 17, Dt. 17.1.2O14

¶19

l.A. NO: I OF 20^{'16(WPMP. NO:1 35't4 0F 2016)}

¶20

Petition under Section 151^{CPC praying that in the circumstances stated} in the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} suspend the Circular Dt.^{4.3.2014 issuedby the 2ndrespondentand proceed} with the conducting of elections^{to the 3rd respondent body as per ElectionFinal} Notification vide Gazett^{No..300,DI. 19.12.2013 and Gazett No. 17,Dt.} 17.1 .2014, pending disposal of the^{above writ petition}

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI^{SUDARSHAN MALUGARI}

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.1 and 2: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW} Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.3 and 4: SRI P VISHNUVARDHANAREDOY} (sc FoR Dcl)

¶23

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶24

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA}

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.1O737^of2O16

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

None appeared for^the Petitioner.

¶28

l,earned Government^{Pleaderfor appearingfor}

¶29

respondents submits^{that the grievance relates to the} election notification^{of the year 2Ol4 and the causeof} action does not^{survive any longer and thereforethe matter}

¶30

has become infructuous.

¶31

In view of the same,^{Writ Petition is dismissed} as infructuous.^{No costs.}

¶32

Consequently, miscellaneous^applications

¶33

pending, if any, in this Writ^{Petition, shall stand closed'}

¶34

SD/- K.SREERAMA^MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTIO OFFICER

To,

One CC to^{Sri Sudarshan tvlalugari, Advocate [OPUCI} 2. Two CCs to Gp^{for n1eOicai'ilJirtna famiiyWbrfare, High Courtfor the State} of Telangana, at^HYderabad [OUT]

¶39

a One dC"to Sri^{P. Vishnuvardhana'Reddv(SC tor DCI)[OPUC]}

¶40