Writ petition challenging eviction proceedings under the Endowments Department; Government Pleader submitted the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33001
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE -OfTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY rwo rHousRNDAND rweurvrtvr
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRITPETITIONNO:17890oF 2017
Between:
AND
Petition underArticle 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be pleased to issuea Writ, Order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Certioraricalling for the records relatingto proceedings in Rc' No' A/1586/2016dated 31.5.2017 and to quash the sameas being illegal' arbitrary and unconstitutionarand consequenflydirect the respondentsnot to evict the petitioners from thepremises bearingD' No' 7-9-2' DeviRoad' Nizamabad'
l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(WPMP.NO: 21848oF 20171
Petition under Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto stay ail furtherproceedings pursuantto proceedingsin Rc' No' A/1 586i2016dated 3l.S.2olT,includingevictionofthepetitionersfromthepremisesbearingD.No.
74-2, Devi Road, Nizamabad, pending (1) payment of arrears of salary and pensionsary benefits to the 1st petitioner, pending disposal of representation of the 2nd petitioner for appointment as a poojari and pending disposal of oA No. ,917o'f 2011 and o.A. No. 944 of 2013 on"the file of the Telangana State Endowments Tribunal and pending disposat of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.KARUNA SAGAR Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: SRI BHUKYA MANGILAL NAIK, Gp FOR ENDOWMENT
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & S: SRI K.MOHAN
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
IIIRIT PETITION No.17 89O of 2Ot7
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up, Sri Bhukya Mangilal Naik, learned Government Pleader for Endowments representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not suryive for adjudication.
2 Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if arry, shall stand closed.
SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA DEPUW REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
secrfforrrcen
To
One CC to SRIBHUKYA MANGILAL NAIK, Advocate [OPUC]
.)1 One CC to SRIK.MOHAN, Advocate [OPUC] ,l i*" CC, i" Cp FORENDbWMENTS,High-Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4 Two CD Copies
PSKCJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1410212025
ORDER
WP.No.17890 ot 2017
B
1HE S14 r6 o
lt cr,'
)l
oc
21 AtlB 206
.r" /
''///
t l)
[sp^T C 1,r,O
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
0 /
//b'
4 7
2 provisions across 2 enactments
B. Gopal Daramana
Gopal Daramana
State of Telangana, repr. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Endowments)
Commissioner, Endowments Department, State of Telangana
Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Nizamabad
Sri Laxmi Narayanaswamy Devi Road Temple, Nizamabad
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
