Dismissed¶43

P. Pravalika, v. The Managing Director

Telangana HC14 Feb 2025WP/25699/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; W.P. No. 25699 of 2013; dismissal of writ petition as infructuous; no costs; miscellaneous applications closed; Article 226 mandamus; challenge to circular dated 6.8.2013 bearing No. M/IKPU/3G/2012 as colourable, arbitrary, violative of natural justice and Articles 14 and 19; Jeevandhara Generic Medicines retail outlet; MCH Hospital, Nirmal; Adilabad; IKP [Urban]; MEPMA; APMSIDC; Drug Control Administration; interim order dated 04.09.2013 in WPMP No. 31721 of 2013; I.A. No. 1 of 2013 (F. No. 3391 of 2013) to vacate interim order; Section 151 CPC; Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka; decided 14-02-2025.

What did the court decide?

In view of learned counsel for the petitioner's submission that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

P. Pravalika, Vs The Managing Director — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH^{DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWOTHOUSAND^{AND TWENWFIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA}

¶7

WRIT PETITION^{NO: 25699 OF 2013}

¶8

Between:

¶9

P.Pravalika,D/o.P.Srinivas,Aged24years,Occ'Business'R/o'H'NO'7-368, Bagulwada, Nirmal,^{Adilabad District'} ....ETIT.ONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 ' d;ffi . The Managing ;;;icofi^{Director, A.P. Medical Services} ;;i6,ilAp t'rts t ocl Hvderabad^and And^{lnfrastructure} Director General' Drus Control Ad ministration

¶12

Mission Director,^{MEPMA,Hyderabad.} - . .. .

¶13

tne Collector,and^{Chairman IKP} [Urban]^Adilabad'

¶14

+. ffre Proiect Director,^IKP [U]^Adilabad' i. ifi;;;ffiLitll.iiii1iinr#^{ano ucH Hospitat,Nirmar,Adirabad District.}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed tlrerewith'the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a Writ, Order^{or Directionin the nature of Mandamus or otheruise} declaringtheactionoftheRespondentsinissuingthecirculardated6.8.2013 bearingNo.M/IKPU/3gl2Ol2isacolourableexerciseofpower'arbitrary'violative of principles of^{naturaljustice and opposed to Art' 14 and 19 of the Constitutionof} lndia and consequently^{set asidethe same'}

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 OF 201^{3(WPMP.NO:31721OF 2013)}

¶18

Petition'underSectionl5lCPCprayingthatintheCircumstancesstatedin the affidavit^{filed in supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct} theRespondentshereinnottointerferewiththefunctioningoftheRetailoutletof thePetitionerestablishedforsaleofgenericmedicinesunderthenameandstyle of Jeevandhara^{Generic Medicines,in the premisesof MCH Hospital'Nirmal} pending disposal of this^{Writ Petitionand be pleased'}

¶19

¶20

" l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013 f'. NO: 3391 OF 2013)

¶21

Between:

¶22

Mission Drrect,rr MEPMA, Hyderabad.

¶23

The Collector^rtr d C hairman IKP [Urban] Adilabad. 3. The Project Dilr:tor', IKP [U] Adilabad.

¶24

...PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS 2,3 & 4

¶25

AND

¶26

1 P. Pravalika, [)rr F'.Srinivas, Aged 24^years, Occ. Business,^{rVo. H.NO.7-3-} 68, Basulwaclz \irrnal, Adilabad District.

¶27

..*rrFp+ip,Btrl?

¶28

The Managing -- ire<;tor, A.P. Medical Services and lnfrastructure Developmenl^{{lc,rporation[APMSIDC]} Hyderabad And Director^{tlleneral,Drug} Control Admink;l ration

¶29

Superintenderr t. Nirrral Area and MCH Hospital, Nirmal, Adilabr,td District.

¶30

(Respondents 1l and 3 are not necessary parties)

¶31

..RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶32

Petition under i ection 151 CPC praying that in the circumst;tnces stated in the affidavit filed irr :up6rort of the^petition, the High Court m;ry be^pleased to vacate the interim order Dt.04.09.2013 passed in WPMP No^:]1;;21 of 2013 in WP No. 25699 of 2,1 1 I .

¶33

Counsel for the Petili,:ne'r: SRI T.S.PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Resp,:ndent Nos.1,2 & 4: GP FOR MED HEALTH /\ND FAMILY WELFARE

¶34

Counsel for the Resp,:nclent No.3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Res p,:nclent No.S: SRI N.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶35

The Court made the fr:llc,wing: ORDER

¶36

l I l : 1I I l i

¶37

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ITAGBSH BHEEMAPAKA

¶38

WRIT PETITION No.25699 of2O13

¶39

ORDER:

¶40

When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for

¶41

adjudication and it has become infructuous.

¶42