Rice millers challenged a G.O. revising factory licence fees as arbitrary and violative of Article 14. With no representation on two occasions, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution without costs and miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Specaal Originat Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETI TION NO: 10174 0F 2017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
circumstances Petition under stated Articre in the 226 affidavit fired of the constitution therewith, of the rndia praying High'cor.t that mry in the'oe pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction more particurarry oie in tne natuie or writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the I respondent ior revision of license fee under the Andhra pradesh Factories Rures, 1'950 (adapted by the staG of Telangana), through G.o.Ms-No.77, Labour Emproyment rraining and Factories (Labour) Department, daled 28.12.2016 is iilegai, aibitrary, exorbi"tant, colourabte exercise of the power and in violation of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and set aside_ the same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble court deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: 10F 2017 PMP. NO: 12609 0F 2017)
Petition under Section 1 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, ine nign court may be preaseJ to suspend the operation of the G.O.Ms.No.77, Labour Emptoyment irainin! a Factories (Labour) Department, dated 28.12.2ot 6 on the fire of tlhe 1st responient pending disposal of the above writ petition
l.A. NO: 2OF 2017(WPMP . NO: '13148 OF 20171
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the schedule of the enhanced fee as additional material in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. V V N NARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR LABOUR
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI{A
WRIT PETITION No.lOl74 of 2OL7
ORDER:
When the writ petition was called on 03.01.2025,
there was no representation on behalf of thepetitioners, hence, it was directed to be listed on 17.O2.2O25 underthe caption for dismissal'. Even today, there isno representation on behalf of thepetitioners.
Pending miscellaneous applications, ifany, shall
stand closed.
SD/- N.RAJA GOPAL DEPUTY REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . One CC to SRl. V V N NARAYANA RAO Advocat e oPUCI
KKS KV ft{q'
I
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1710212025
ORDER
\
WP.No.10174 of 2017
Z=-:=_----
.1Hb- S i4r:
c
(),
(,
oo
? I Jul 2gZ5
o
i
f) t/
:'".: ra.rro
-<:=.:__;
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
:-l<sup>s V
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rice Millers Association, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District, rep. by its Secretary
Sri Aglaj Paraboiled Rice Mills Pvt Ltd, rep. by its Managing Director
The State of Telangana, Labour Employment Training and Factories (Labour) Department, rep. by its Principal Secretary
The Inspector of Factories, Nalgonda Circle, Nalgonda District
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
