Writ petition challenging registration of a case and bailable warrants by the Mandal Legal Services Committee was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 14958 0F 2017
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the 2nd Respondent in entertaining and registering a case in PLC No.5 of 2017 tiled by the 3rdRespondent and subsequent bailable warrant issued on 12.04.2017 as illegal , arbitrary against the provisions of Legal Service Authority Act, 1987 without jurisdiction and against settled principles of law and consequently set aside the proceedings in pLC No.S of 2017,including bailable warrants, on the file of 2nd Responde4t,
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2O1 L[WP ULt lPil-g4qg-o F2qA
Petition unrler. Sr::tion151 cPC praying that in the circumstan:es statedin the affidavitfiled in supprort of the petition, the High court may be pl6rased to stay all furtherproceedirrgs,including bailable warrants dl. 12-04-2017, in PLCNo. 5t2017 on the file of2nd respondent, pendingdisposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitiorrers:SRI B. CHANDRASEN REDDY
counsel for theF.esporrdentNos.1 and 2: GP FOR EMPLOYMENTIi TRAINING Counsel for the RespondentNo.3:-"
The Gourt madelhe following:ORDER
-7
HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA WRITPETITIO N No.1495 8of 20L7
ORDER:
When thematter has been taken up for hearing,learned counsel for petitionerssubmitted that the causein the present writ petitiondoes not survive for adjudicationand it has become infructuous'
2 In viewof the same' Writ Petitionis dismissed
as infructuous'No costs.
SD/. T. JAYASREE AS IS T REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
l
CTION OFFICER
To,
TJ GJP
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:17,t0212025
ORDER
WP.No.14958 of 2011
H E :r .T4 14:
!.
,<br>tt
I o:) 02 nin Z[2S p
'.,i'
'r'4:-
.
._ ,.'{..j -
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTIONS WITHOUT COSTS
7 4-.3 <r4,/3 ,/,1{
3 provisions across 3 enactments
M/s. Garg Steels Udyog India Pvt Ltd., rep. by its Director Mr. Satish Kumar Agarwal
Mr. Bidiyasar Raji Ram
Mr. Prema Ram
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Labour and Employment Department, Hyderabad
The Chairman, Mandal Legal Services Committee, Medak, Telangana State
Mr. A Hareesh
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
