The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 4087 of 2012 filed by Lilloo and R. Venkata Ramana against the AP Administrative Tribunal. The petition was dismissed as non-prosecution because the petitioner did not appear in court to present their case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:4 087 0F 20't2
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
Petition under Articte 226of the Constitution of tndia #::T]ffT: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High'court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or writs, ordLr or direction, to call for the records pertaining to Order dt.28.11.2011 passed in o.A.No. 4598 of 2009 on the file of Hon'ble A.p. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and quash the same by declaring it to be illegal, arbitrary and u nconstitutional; Award costs
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(WPMP . NO: 5150 OF 20121
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to Grant stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the order dt. 29.11 .2011 passed in O.A No. 4598 of 2009 on the file of Hon'ble A.p Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the W.p.No.4087 of 2012
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 2902 OF 2012)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to grant leave to the petitioners to prefer Writ Petition against the order dt. 28.11.2011 passed in O.A.No 4598 of 2009 on the file of Hon'ble AP Amdinistrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in the interests ofjustice
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. K V SUDHAKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.4O87 of 2OL2
ORDER: (Per th", Hon'ble Si JtLstice Abhinand Kumar Shauih)
None appears for the petitioner in spite of the Writ Petition is listed under the caption "for dismissal." Hence, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for no n - pro secu tion.
SD/- P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// TFGISTRAR
To,
1 2 Two CCs one cc to to SRI Gp K FoR v .,DHAKAR EIM,L.'MENT REDDy a rnnrlrlr.rE Advocr," ltigh ,or;:"8fu'"t*court for the state of Telangana. [OUT]
J 4 One CC to SRl. frEDt/B.MANJULATHA VEDAVALLY Advocate tOpUCl Two CD Copies One Spare Copy
KM GJP c\('
HIGH COURT
DATED :1311012022
ORDER
4-:<br>,,% <Fl s a.,, a t
(J
\ff
-
WP.No.4087 of 2012
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS.
e s.Nl
LILOO S/O LINGAIAH
R. VENKATA RAMANA S/O R. GANGULAH
THE COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
