Writ petition for directing respondent to permit petitioner's bank account operation dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time. Liberty to file a fresh case granted.
Liberty granted to file a fresh case if need arises; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO W.P.No.26068 of 1999
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the 3rd respondent to
permit the petitioner to operate the bank account bearing No.45021.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Hence, this Court is of the considered view that due to efflux of time,
the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to file a fresh case if any need arises. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
________________________________________ JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Date: 12.10.2022 Myk/rkk
Petitioner
3rd Respondent
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
