The Telangana High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 20677 of 2012 as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer survives for adjudication. The petition sought the quashing of tribunal judgments and government orders.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3318 l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PET|T|ON NO: 20677 OF 2012
Between:
S.V. Ramana, S/o. S.V- Sarma, aged about 53 years, Occ: Executive Officer Grade-|, O/o. Gramapanchayat, tbiahimpatnam, hangi nedOy Distiict.---
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ of certiorari and quash the judgment dated 25.6.2012 in o.A. No.'1644 of 2010 on the file of the A.p. Administiative Tribunal at Hyderabad and consequently set aside the G.o_Ms. No. g1 panchayat Raj and Rurar Development (Mdl.ll) Department dated 20.2.2010 and consequential G.o.Ms. No. 84 Panchayat Raj and Rural Deveropment (Mdr.il) Department dated 24.2.2010 issued by the 1st respondent and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, u nconstitutional and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2012(W PMP. NO: 265'tB oF 20121
Petition under section l5'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the Judgment dated 25-06-2012 in o.A.No.1644 ot 2010 on the file of the
A.P Administrative Tribunar at Hyderabad and consequenfly suspend the G o'Ms'No.81, panchayat Raj and Rurar Deveropment (Mdilr) Department dated
20-02-2,-010 and consequential G.O.Ms.No. g4, panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Mdr.il) Department dated 24-02-2010 issued by the .rst respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the petitioner: SRt. p.RAJAGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR SERVICES ll
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IJON'BLE SRI JUS'TICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
\YRI'l' PETITION No. 20677 of 2012
ORDER: (Per tht Hon'ble Sri Justicc Althinan<l Kunat Shtuili)
\Wtren the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not sluvive for adjudication and hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the said submission, the writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
I
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-B.CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANAREGISTRAR C)D
SECTION OFFICER
To
PSK. GJP '%.
I
HIGI.I COURT
DATED:13/10t2022
ORDER
WP.No.20577 of 2012
L -l ,x
,a I
*
'!!
R ir
N oul
E
i =:
) agJ a,/
{
c t<br>
Dismissing of The W.p as lnfructuous Without costs.
@w
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India survives for adjudication when counsel submits the cause is infructuous.
S.V. Ramana
Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development
The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj & Rural Employment, A.P.
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeswar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
