In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners sought quashing of A.P. Administrative Tribunal orders. The court observed that as the matter pertained to transfer and efflux of time had occurred, the cause did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE TWELFTHDAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION NO:8385 OF 20'12
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
PetitionUnderArlicle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances statedin the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order ordirection more particularlyone in the nature of i,Wrrt of Certiorari,' calting for the records relating to the orders of the A.P. AdministrativeTribunalpassedinO.A.No.E365of20'lldated2T-12-2011and quash the same as beingperverse, in excessof jurisdictionand contrary to law
l.A.NO:1 OF 20 'MP.NO: 10619 OF 2012
Petition ljncer sectron 151 cpc praying that rn the crr(lui'starces stated in the affidavit fileri il s,upport of the petition. the Hrgh Cturt rrzrl be pleased to suspend the operatiot()f the orders in O.A. No. g365 of 2011 dat,_.d 1.7_12_2011. on the file of A P A lnrin,strative Tribunal. Hyderabad, pendri l lisposat of the wflt petition
Counsel for the Petit oners : Gp FOR SERVICES - l
Counsel for the Resp orrdent No.1 : SRI.SANTHAPUR SATYANI,ttAyANA RAO
Counsel for the Resp:ndent No.2 : ---
The Court made the f rllowing ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KTJMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVI\RAPU RAJESIrWAR RAO
Writ Petition No.83 85 of2Ol2
ORDER : (Per Hon'ble Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauilt)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Services, appearing for the petitioners, has informed the Court that the issue in the Writ Petition pertains to transfer and with the efflux of time the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Accordingly, the urrit petition is dismissed. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if
any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //rRUE coPY/, aD
SECTIONOFFICER
To
1 TwoCCtoGPFoRSERVICES-lll,HighcourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hvderabad. [oUT] 2 lj'"""=aCi; diGAxrunpu n sATYANARAYANARAo' Advocate[oP uc] J Two CD Copies 4 One sparecoPY
S.A. BS
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 2110t2.022
ORDER
WP.No.8385 of 2012
:<br>-.= :;:A] ,.--:l.r:.
i
{
, ,., ) \fl
.)a
It,,
,,,.I
..::,
,.
DISMISSING THE W.P
WITHOUT.CCISTS.
9, .)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause in the writ petition concerning transfer survives adjudication after efflux of time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
The Deputy Director of Social Welfare, Nalgonda
The Commissioner of Social Welfare
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Social Welfare Department
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Finance Department
Smt N Narasamma
The A P Administrative Tribunal
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwarao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
