The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed for a declaration regarding non-payment of pension enhancement, holding that the cause did not survive for adjudication and the petition was infructuous.
No relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Orlginal Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI - AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO,'
WRIT PETITION NO: 3584 OF 200?/
Betwee n:
BSA Satyanarayana, Sio. Suryanarayana li4urthy. aged about 60 yrs, Occ:Retired HSG-Il, Sorting Assistant in Railrvay l\4ail Service, Hyderabad Sorting Division presently practicing as an Advocate. R1o. H. No.2-2 -1121131E, Nallkunta, Hyderabad.
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed thcrewith, the High Court may be
thot lho Hon'ble Court moy be pl€osed to issue on oppropriot6 Vr'ril,
Order or dlrection more porliculorly one in the nolure of Wtil of Ceriiorori
l
(i) colling follhe racords parloin;ng lo lho proceecingr ilsuod by lha
4rh Respondent in No.J/Pensioners/c on/m2{N. doled 1A-GN): iii) decioring thot the oction of iho 4,,,Respondenl in nol pdyino ihe
:rlr rrr, .ii.-' ',:'. ),. .' : .,. . , : _-JiLlJi _trr/vih ,j ,-.. ::i,
(1
oi lh! !lr. I'il', -)!i: r..i:'tl,lrli,.r{2{llr oolod 27"GX)1 onC ogo"ri iu e .. --i i_i .' |:itii, .r ir: : anl:O.li'Lrle5 OndOgcinllthoOr,J?f:)l lire ,-;-..er' r.- ,l c' r:i - ir, - i,l i))./-l'tla5P ePW iF) doled l4'l-1?i5r:: 3t01e(j n p(ji.r-, ()l-lr ::ld frroceeJingt; consequently (irii j.li -r c,.' h,r J:r:::eecings tssued by the 4'" Rerp"ncenl ir' l.l5 l,/i'.,.)! .i,)t /.c:i', )),l2-1ll .j.r6,d I4-6-Xfi: consequenlly liv) decl:rro fte 1u iprneni ol ine 5i,Raspondsnt in OA No.7BO ol Z{}; ccic(; 3 l l-.r 42 ., e0ri, oibiiron, ond uncorutitutjond(porl lr ):iieli,;,.'i rl ': ci i i i rie5 .,1 nc'.Jioi justlce ond ogolnJl the ,judgm ]icf ini. llcriJ.(lcrl iiy/:'l'.ic. rd439 cf 2OOO ond sei oside the :et.re l!,) .irre.rl r'1/) /n t. ,nclenl! I to d topoy pt6 lhe enhonr o,:i c:ci'..r-i-re. , :.r-- ri n, palricr '.r: iire role of 4Ci% o5 on 1-l- 796 1o ii:. Doia'i:r ' ".:-r.r',.', ri,:.t ial
l.A. NO: 2 OF 200:IVPMP. NO: 4710 OF 2003
F)el lrrr I ul]i; rf s{)ction151 CPC prayingthat ir the c r(-unrstances state(i in tlre afirl;:'.rl f l€drr -r-rpportof tho petition,the High Coutl tll;v be pleastlrJ to cjircct the RCsl-rorr(lrjrrts1 io 4 herein and forthwithpay elrhanci): conrmLltecl value of pens !rrrr.r.i; f O'( :i 2C03.pending disposalof the ablve'w it pet tion /
Counsel for theP rtitioner(s): SRl. NANDIGAM KRISHNAIIAO '-' Counsel for tlteF espondents:SRI' M.V. KRISHNA MOHA\ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA,,,
The Courl nradeI re following:ORDER
HON'BLIa Snr Jtjs'r'rcE ABHINANI) KLrMAlt SHA/l I-l AND
HON',BLE SRr JUS',I'rCE NAMAVAITAPU TLAJESHWAR nAC)
W.P.No.3584 Ot" 2003
ORI)liR:(l'cr Hon'hlcSri.lusticetll..ltintur<llitun;r Slt:t'ili)
\When the marter is talren up for hcaring, learnecl
counsel appearing for the petitioncr subrnits that the cause ln thc writ petition does not survivc for adjudication and hence, the writ petition h:rs bccornc infmctuous.
In view of the said submission, tire\Mit Pc-lition is
disrnissed as irfnlctuous. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shrrll strrncl
closcd.
SD/-I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY-EEGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// (fr SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 2 3ffi 33lSi3!,t+IRi"SLlS+'#3ff'"-tt"3E'l'il?IXSJ""ateroPUCl 3 Two CD CoPies KAR GJP e-
HIGH COURI
DATED:12l1Al?.022
ORDER
'*'''1"'7ui.-;ot'
l,i ,.. 1:r1
, t: l
WP.No.3584 of 2003
DISMISSING.)F THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTI'OUS
WITHOUT CCSTS
5r?rq +- aa;
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the cause in the writ petition survives for adjudication.
Whether the petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
BSA Satyanarayana
Union of India
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
