Petitioner, a retired Divisional Forest Officer, sought promotion via writ petition. The High Court found the petition infructuous as the petitioner had retired during its pendency.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3318 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 3650 OF 2005
Between:
M.S. Devikar, l.F.S, S/o.Shiveharan, aged 50 years, Occ : Divisional Forest Officer, Wild Life Management, Warangal-
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and quash the same by declaring the action of the Hon03gble Central Administrative Tribunal in dismissing the O.A.No.11912004, dated 5l8l04 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently declare the action authorities in adopting scaled cover procedure in the DPC held on 3l7lO3 by taking into consideration the charge sheet Dt. 1415l2OO3 as illegal arbitrary and direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the selection grade and suppertime scale on par with his batch mates with all consequential benefits.
LA.NO:1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 3554 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased drspense v.,ith filing of the Certified copy of the orderpassed in OS 119/04 dt. 5- 8-2004passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, andpass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 4920 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased suspend the order of O.A.No. 11912004 dated 5/08/2002 and to reconsider the case of the petitioner for thepromotion to selectiongrade and to super time scale on par with his batch mates as on 31/03/2001 with all consequential benefits pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 27268 OF 2005)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to expedite the hearing of the WP No. 3650/2005 by fixing an early date forthwith.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 21019 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased fix an early date for the final hearing of above said writ petition.
l.A.NO:2 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 27594 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to consider the Review of the sealed cover procedure in terms of the Government of lndia memo No.20019/01/2000-lFS.ll dated 22-122000 and thereafter consider the claim of thepetitioner forpromotion to the selection grade and Super Time Scale.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 16293 OF 2007)
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to consider the Review fo the sealed cover procedure adopted by Departmental Committee in their meeting held on 13-7-2003 in terms of the Government of lndia memo dated 22-12-2000 for considering the claim of the Petitioner for promotron to the selections grade and super Time Scale.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SMT.K.UDAYA SRI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL OFINDIA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : GP FOR SERVICES -l
The Court made the following ORDER
/
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Writ Petition No.3650 of 2OO5
ORDER: (Per Hor'ble Justice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court thht during pendency of the present Writ Petition the petitioner had retired from service thereby rendering the Writ Petition as infructuous.
any in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
TJ;is?I$Y'f'ti!?Ht[ //TRUE coPY// (l{,
\
SECTI'ONOFFICER
To 1 Two CC toG.P FOR SERVICES-l' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hvrlerabad.(OUT) 2 3ffi 33Biyl5l'^'^n"$?B'#[3ti,LKt"3',ND'AroPUC] 4. TwoCD CoPies . OnesPare coPY
BM sw5/
HIGH COURT
DATED:1311012022
<br>?
s
L-r
t=<br>ORDER e: /:.
r<br>(:
WP.No.3650 of 20052005 o .,1<br>
WP.No.3650 of 20052005
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
1b
ANI'
M.S. Devikar
Union of India
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
