Remanded

I.Chandrasekhar and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Telangana HC14 Jun 2021WP/8969/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Article 226 and a civil suit for interim relief under Section 151 CPC, the Telangana High Court addressed complaints of unauthorized construction. Without expressing an opinion on the merits, the Court directed the District Collector to investigate the matter regarding illegal encroachment and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

The 2nd respondent-District Collector is directed to look into the matter and pass appropriate orders on the petitioner's representations within four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this o

I.Chandrasekhar and 2 Others Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

IVONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD

¶6

wRl T PETITION NO: 8969 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

l. Chand rasekhar, S/o. Kurmanna, Aged. 42^{years, Occ. Agriculture,} Fl/o. Bijwaram Village, Maldakal l/andal, Gadwal^{District, T.S.}

¶9

B.Govihdu, S/o- ohinna Savaaranna, Aged^{50 years Occ. Agriculture,} R/o. Bijwaram Village, tr/aldakal^{Nrlandal,GadwalDistrict, T.S.}

¶10

B.Ashdnna, S/o, BlSavarnna,^{Aged 60 years, Occ. Agriculture,R/o Bijwaram} Village, l/aldakal lt4andal, Gadwal District, T.S.

¶11

...pETtTtONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rep.by^{its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Dept,} Off at Secretariat, Hyderabad^T.S

¶14

The District Collector, Gadwal^{District, Gadwal Town.}

¶15

The Additional Collector,^{Local Bodies, Gadwal District, Gadwal Town' T S.}

¶16

The District Panchayath Officer, Gadwal^{District, Gadwal Town, T.S.}

¶17

The Tahsildar, lValdakal lvlandal,^{Gadwal District, T.S.}

¶18

The Nllandal Parishat Development^{officer, Ivlaldakal lVandal,Gadwal District.}

¶19

G.Krishna Reddy, S/o,G.Krishna^{Reddy,AgedlVajor,Occ. Business,}

¶20

R/o.Bijwaram, Gadwal District T.S.

¶21

...RES'ONDENTS

¶22

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to} issue an appropriate writ order or direction,^{more particularlya writ in the nature of} writ of Mandamus, declaring the^{inaction of the Respondents2 to 6 in not considering} and passing appropriate orders on the^{Representations dated 1510212021 and} 1glo3t2o21 of the^petitioners on the^{illegal encroachmentand to stop the} unauthorized construction in the Grama^{Kantam Village landin Sy. No.1 81/K to an} extent of Ac. 4.00 situated^{at Bijwaram Village lr/aldakallvlandal GadwalDistrict T.S.} by the Respondent No. 7 is arbitrary^{unjust, unfair, illegaland in violationof Article} 14, of Constitution of lndia and^{principalof natural Justiceand consequently direct} the Respondents 2 to 6 to^{consider and pass appropriate orders on the} Representation dated 15t0212021^{and 1910312021 of the petitioners on the illegal} encroachment and to Stop^{the unauthorized construction in the GramaKhantam} village land in Sy. No. 181/K^{to an extent of Ac. 4.00 situatedat BijwaramVillage} lValdakal Mandal Gadwal^{District in the interest of justice.}

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶24

Petition under section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^{petition, the High court may be pleasedto pass interim} order to direct the Respondents^{2 to 6 to consider and passappropriate orders on the} Representation dated^{151O2t2O21and 19t0312021 of the petitioners on the illegal}

¶25

encroachment and to stop the unauthorized construction in the Grama^Kantam Village land in Sy. No. 181/K to an extent of Ac. 4.00 situated at Bijwaram Village Maldakal Mandal Gadwal District pending the above W.P. in the interest of^justice.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SHAFATH AHMED KHAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT

¶27

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: SRI G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI POTTIGARI SRIDHAR REDDY

¶29

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶30

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICET.AMARN} ATH GOUD WRIT PETIT^{IONNo.8969of 2021}

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

I lt is the^{case of the petitioner that he is residentof Bijwaram} village, Maldakal^{Mandal' Gadwal District The 7rh respondentis making} unauthorized^{construction in public Iand /Grama Kantamand in that} regard^{the petitionerliled his objectionsbeforethe officialrespondents2} to 6 and^{sincetheyhave not initiated any action'the present Writ} Petition is^filed.

¶33

2 Heard^{Sri Pottigari SridharReddy ieamed counsel appearing for} 7rh respondent^{a-rld Government Pleaders for Panchayat Raj and Rural} Development'^{Revenue and Sri GNarenderReddy' learnedstanding} counsel^{for the Gram Panchayat'}

¶34

3 It is the^{case of the 7th respondentthat the constructionis in} progress^{which is in the property of the 7*' respondentand that it is} Grama^{Kantam arld that it is his privateproperty and he has obtained all} necessary Permissions'

¶35

4 Having^{regard to the factsand circumstancesof the case and} without^{expressingany opinion on merits' this Writ Petitionis disposed} of directing^{the 2'd respondent- DistrictCollector to look into the matter} and^{pass appropriate orders and inaccordancewith iaw on the} representations^{madeby the petitioner withina periodof fourweeks} from the^{date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.} Misceilaneous^{petitions if aly pending in this Writ Petittonshallstand} closed

¶36

SD/. N.CHA^{NDRA SEKHAR RAO} ASSISTANT^REGIST R

¶37

//TRUE^COPY//

¶38

SECTION^OFFICER

¶39

To, 1 . The Principal^{Secretary,f anchayatRa'iDepartment'State of Telangana' Off at} Seiretariai,^{Hyderabad T S} al District,^{Gadwal T_own-} 2 3 'ii:Etxli:d&!F"i,'.l?:AnrX,:stffi ;ps[y,fl ,i5yl'*,rSws]+:J^-' 4. The District^PanchayathL

C"n+J"

The Tahsildar, Maldakal Mandal, Gadwal District, T.S.

¶44

The lMandal Parishat Development Officer, Maldakal tr/andal, Gadwal District.

¶45

One CC to Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, Advocate IOPUC] B. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶46

One CC to Sri G. Narender Reddy, SC for Grampanchayat, Advocate tOpUCl

¶47

1 0. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶48

1 1. One CC to Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI

¶49

12.Two CD Copies

¶50

One Spare Copy

*--

HIGH COURT

:t !

) 1

DATED:1410612021

ORDER

WP.No.8969 of 2021

\ 1E: ST4I
/.
/q
! .)
t{3\r
\I:';'
\r)<br>

¶60

DISPOSING OF THE WP.

¶61

WITHOUT COSTS,

¶62

Mtvt
[,

I.Chandrasekhar and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

I.Chandrasekhar and 2 Others v. The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K. Ashok Kumar Vs Smt. Chitra Ramachandran and Another

Shaik Muzammil Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. Alwala Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Mada Vasavi, Vs Prl.Secy., Panchayat Raj and Rural Developement, Hyd., and 4 Ot

L.Manikanth, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

S.Dhanalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana