The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the setting aside of G.O.Ms.187 regarding appointment of persons in-charge to Mandal Parishads. The petition was declared infructuous at the bar.
Pert int petition dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE SI .ArHYDER_fJioF TELANGANA (rpeciat Original Jurisdiction)
MOI?TY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWo THoUsAND ANb rwelriv-riG" "-
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRI T PETITtoN NO:2 1169 oF 20 11
Between:
AND
u:,:EF"J3"?3lXi,?!?,1,i,i1a33ry!3#1ff
PetitionunderArticle226oftheconstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in tn""rtii.riiiir.d therewith, the High court may be pleasedto issue awrit, order o,. o,rliioi"*ore particuraayone iri the nature of the writ of tVlandamusdecraring tnJ"u.iion ot the Respondents in issuing G.o.Ms.187, PanchayatRaj & Rural o","r"p'l"i teiett q Rules) Department dated21 '07 2011 as ultra vires,illegal, ,roitru|.v,I"to nsiltutionat and. malafide and consequently to set aside the sameand oireci $ie Respondents to utilisethe servicesof the Petitioners ,.ploonoin-charge to their respective ti/andal Parishads'
PMP NO:2 740 011
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court maybe pleasedto suspend the op"rrtion ot C.O.tr,ts.teZ,PanchayatRaj & RuralDevelopment (Elecs & Rules) Department dated21 .O7.2011and direct the Respondentsto utilisethe services of the Petitioners asPe rsons- in-charge to their respective t/andal Parishadspending the disposal of thepresentWritPetition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SIVA S. LANKA Counsel for the Respondents: GPFOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI T TII WRIT PETI TION No.2 t1 of 20 11
ORDER:
I The learned counser for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ petition does not survive.
2 Recording the said submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this Writ petition sha1l stand closed.
\
To,
SD/- K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 6-
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
sm
\ .;--
HIGH COURT
DArED:1410612021
ORDER
WP.No.21 169 of 2011
1 il s T4
O 2 5 JUi\l 202t
C)
DISMISSING THE WP
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
)k
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause for the writ petition survives to be adjudicated on merits.
L. Vanikanth and others
State of Telangana
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
