The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging the absence of a reserved category in Panchayat elections as infructuous following the petitioner's counsel's submission, without costs.
Dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous, with no order for costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 7774 OF 2014
Betwee n:
It/ada Vasavi, W/o Narayana Reddy, Aged 31 Yrs, Occ:Housewife,Rl/o Goilwada
(V) Ramagundem Village Karimnagar District.
...'ET.T'ONER
AND
...RES,.NDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamusdeclaringthe action of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in issuing GazetteNotificationNo.8,Dt. 06-03-2014 for Ramagundam Mandal, Karimnagar District, withoutproviding quota for Women/General/unreserved category is illegal,arbitrary,unco nstitutionaland violative of Article 14, 15, 19 and 243-D(3) of Constitutionof lndia and against, also provisions of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 r/w rules there under and consequently set aside the same and direct the RespondentNo. 3 to modify and alterthe same as per the provisions of A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.
WPMP. NO: 9662 OF 2014
Petition under Section'l 51 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleased to stay/ suspend the Gezette Publication No. 8, dated 06-03-20'14of RamagundamNrlandal, Karimnagar District issued by 3rd Respondentpending disposalof the main Writ Pelition andpass order or orders as the Hon'blemay deem fit and proper in the interest of circumstances and Justice,
WPMP. NO: 9663 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmaybe pleased to direct sth respondent not to proceed further proceedings with regard to conduction ofensuing MPTC elections for 14 constituencies in Ramagundam Mandal,KarimnagarDistrict, based on the Gezette Notification No.B, dated 06-03-2014issued by3rd Respondent, pending disposal of this writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. CHAKRAPANI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ &RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI P.SUDHEER RAO, SCFOR TSEC Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
t
THE HON'B LE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITI ON No.7774 of2Ol4
ORDER:
I The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in
the present Writ Petition does not survive.
2 Recording the sajd submission, this Writ petition is dismissed as
having become infruetuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions
if any pending in this Writ petition sha-ll stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/.I.NAGA LAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
i
\
SECTION OFFICER
To
snl gbr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1410O12021
ORDER
;,.E STA I{:
Y
a-
oo 2 3 Jl.)ll ?trl
-t.
WP.No.7774 of 2014
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of now that it has become infructuous.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
It/ada Vasavi
Government of A.P.
The Commissioner, Panchayat Raj and Rural Employment
District Collector
State Election Commission
T. AMARNATH GOUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
