Dismissed
S.Dhanalaxmi v. The State of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/3915/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T, AMARNATH GOUD
WRlT PETITION NO: 3915 OF 2018
Between:
S.Dhanalaxmi, W/o.Rajanna Aged about32 yearc,Occ:Mini Ang-anwadi Teacher, R/o.Harijanawbda, Suijapur Village, KhanapurMandal (CDPOKhanapur)Nirmal District, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition underArticle226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased to issue awrit of Mandamusor any other appropriatewrit, order or direction, declaringthe action of the respondents not includedthe petitioner name in the Final SelectedlistofAnganwadiTeacherdated24.0l.20lsisillegalarbitrary,unjustand capriciousand utter violation of article 14' 16 and 21 of Constitutionof lndia apart from opposedto all principles of naturaljusticeand consequentlydirect the respondentsto include the name of petitioner in the Final SelectedList of AnganwadiTeacher dated24-1-201B'
lA NO:1 OF 2018
petition under section151 cpc prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the High court may be pleased to direct the respondentsto includethe name of petitioner in the FinalSelectedList of AnganwadiTeacherdaled 24-1-2018 pending the disposalof the mainwrit petition' Counselfor the Petitioner:SRI'B' KARTHIK NAVAYAN
Gounser "'$ ?e"{i^ls#it'o='='oPMENr AND cHrLD *ELFARE
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
/
THE HO N'BLE SRI CE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION No. 3915 of2018
ORDER:
I The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the
court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Writ petition.
2 Permission accorded
3 In the result, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No
order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in this Writ
Petition shall stand closed.
SD/.K,ONESIM
//TRUE COPY'
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \L-
SECTION OFFICER
\
To,
I One CC to Sri B. Karthik Navayan, Advocate [OPUC]
2 Two CCs to GP for Women Development and Child Welfare, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 Two CD Copies CHR
\ '-t'-
HIGHGOURT
DATED:14 10612021
ORDER
W.P.No.3915of 2018
t\ c i TA 74:
(
(+(
(),) 2I illll 2021
*
DE.spATcli c1
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
@
Ib,
S. Dhanalaxmi
The State of Telangana
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court