Dismissed

Shaik Muzammil v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Jun 2021WP/13086/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition regarding non-payment of stipend to 63 house surgeons. The writ petition was consequently dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps and no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take appropriate steps.

Shaik Muzammil Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE SI .^{AT HYDE#JIOFTELANGANA} (upeciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

FII.%I, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE rwo rHousAND AND r,rvir.rii oiri-

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUST]CE T.AMARNATH GOUD

¶5

Between:

¶6

TP TI NN oF2 1

¶7

;.lfr :{g!ffij{frq;l',l"..r",miil;1i'to-,,f^i,:,ffi $kn;:#,,:,t1ffi

¶8

AND

¶9

...PETITIONERS

¶10

'l . werrare The State o"p"rtr",it]t1.T"13;,Y of Telano:^{tlr3ijI:5' Hearth, Medicarand} ,^Famirv ^ 5f ili33ffi lllgiTfim;:',::1",.:i::,:..U,:t'**;ll;j;,uo,a.sooooa Hyderabad-500002.

¶11

...RESPONDENTS

¶12

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High corrt ,'rv^-o.pl"aseo to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, moie particurarry one in the nature of I\ilandamus.by decraring not paying of stipend to House Surgeons ot neiponJent-s Hospital, who compreted 9[ BUMS 4th year from Govt. Niiamia rioui-Colt"g" on transfer from Al-Arif unani Medical college in BUMS 3rd year, despite represeniation Daled.12-03-21, as discriminatory, irrational, unjust, ittigal, arbitrary and against articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and cons"quenfly to iirect. Respondents to pay stipend to 63 house surgeons of Respondent-3 Hbspital, wno completed 4th final year BUMS from Govt. Nizamia Tibbi college, on transfer from Al-Arlf Unani Medical college in 3rd year BUMS, from o1-03-21 till their completion and to report its compliance to Hon'ble Court.

¶13

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶14

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in supporl of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents to consider representations Dtd.12.03.21 of petitioners and pay stipend to 63 House Surgeons of Govt. Nizamia General Hospital, who completed BUMS final year from Govt. Nizamia Tibbi College on transfer from Al-Arif Unani Medical College in BUMS 3rd year, from 01.03.21 till its completion, pending disposal of this writ petition.

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. MOUNIS ABIDI

¶16

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL AND HEALTH FAMILY WELFARE

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

GOUD CE T. THE HON'BLESRI oF2 02L WRIT PETITIO^{N No. 13086}

¶19

ORDER:

¶20

Learned^{counselfor the petitionerssubmittedthat the} petitioners may^{be permitted to withdraw the writ petition} with a liberty to^{take appropriatesteps'}

¶21

Permission is accorded.

¶22

In the result, the^{Writ Petitionisdismissedas} withdrawn with a liberty to^{take appropriate steps. No order} as to costs.

¶23

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, sha1l also^stand

¶24

dismissed.

¶25

¶26

SD/. B. SATYAVATHI ASSiSTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// tx/

¶27

¶28

SECTION^OFFICER

¶29

To'l Hish courtrorthe^State ?;3 33J1"EB#i,$!;'41':'iffl:?i,fl?!onf',!$]"'"'"' ' ;i'i"ir;s;;Jat HYderabad' ' [our]

¶30

Two^{CD CoPies} '

¶31

One^SPareCoPY

SM TP

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1110612021

.(I

o
\s'
lt
a"
,,
\u-

¶36

ORDER

¶37

WP.No.13086 of 2021

¶38

DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WTHOUT COSTS

¶39

D
t1 <br>

Shaik Muzammil v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Muzammil v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bashetty Gundaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Doti Narsamma Vs The State of Telangana and 7 Others

P. Nagaraju Vs The State of Telangana

K. Ashok Kumar Vs Smt. Chitra Ramachandran and Another

Sri. Alwala Rajendra Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Doddi Bhadraiah, Vs The State of Telangana