Durga Ram v. Bhom Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought a direction for the Sub-Divisional Officer, Lohawat, to decide a summary application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC read with Section 151 CPC pending in a civil suit before the final decree is passed.
What did the court decide?
Directions to the SDO, Lohawat to decide the application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC read with Section 151 CPC in Suit No.198/2022 at the earliest before passing the final decree.
What the court decided
[2024:RJ-JD:12201]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3679/2024
Durga Ram S/o Phusa Ram, aged about 70 Years, R/o Phalli, Lohawat, Phalodi, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
- Bhom Raj S/o Mangi Lal, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
- Sumitra W/o Bhom Raj, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
- Umeda Ram S/o Aasu Ram, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
- Chanana Ram S/o Aasu Ram, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
- Bhagwana Ram S/o Aasu Ram, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
- Khama D/o Aasu Ram, R/o Palli-I, Lohawat, District Jodhpur (Rajasthan)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Sub-Divisional Officer to decide the summary application under Order IX Rule 7 CPC before passing the final decree.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Durga Ram
- respondent
Bhom Raj
- respondent
Sumitra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/3679/2024
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court