Santokh Singh withdrew his Letters Patent Appeal with liberty to move an application explaining delay on the basis of a fresh cause of action in 2011.
Withdrawal of the Letters Patent Appeal with liberty to move an application before the Single Judge to explain delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Letters Patent Appeal No.983 of 2015 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 08, 2015
Santokh Singh
.....Appellant
versus
The State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.
Present: Mr.D.S.Patwalia, Senior Advocate,
Mr.Sehaj Bir Singh, Advocate, for the appellant.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
After arguing the appeal for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the same with liberty to move an application before the learned Single Judge to explain the delay on the basis of fresh cause of action which is said to have arisen in the year 2011 when the Officers Committee accepted the claim of his junior(s).
Ordered accordingly.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
July 08, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.07.09 11:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant may withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal with liberty to move an application explaining delay.
Santokh Singh
The State of Punjab
Surya Kant
P.B.Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
