The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of CWP No.11694 of 2000 by reference to a connected order in CWP No.8713 of 2000 (Karnail Singh vs. State of Haryana) without rendering separate reasoning in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.11694 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2015
Devi Singh & Anr.
... Petitioners
VS.
State of Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: None for the petitioners
Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Addl. AG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)
For orders, see CWP No.8713 of 2000 titled as
Karnail Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. of even
date.
������������� ������
�����������
��������������
�����������������
������
V.VISHAL 2015.07.10 10:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to any specific relief in this connected matter.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Karnail Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.Followed¶20
CWP No.8713 of 2000 titled as Karnail Singh & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Devi Singh & Anr.
State of Haryana & Ors.
Surya Kant
P.B. Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
