Petitioners withdrew the writ petition after learning the appropriate recourse is to approach administrative authorities, pursuant to liberty granted during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.13389 of 2015 Date of Decision: July 08, 2015
Babu Ram and others
.....Petitioners
versus
The State of Haryana and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BAJANTHRI.
Present: Mr.Namit Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
Having understood that the appropriate recourse for the petitioners would be to approach the administrative authorities, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this writ petition.
With liberty afore-mentioned, the writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
[SURYA KANT]
JUDGE
July 08, 2015 [P.B.BAJANTHRI] mohinder JUDGE
MOHINDER KUMAR 2015.07.10 11:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Babu Ram and others
The State of Haryana and others
Surya Kant
P.B.Bajanthri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
