Allowed

Karnail Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC7 Jul 2015CWP/8713/2000

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of Writ Petitions No. 8713 & 11694 of 2000, which challenged a notification amending the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. Relying on the Full Bench judgment of Jai Singh vs. State of Haryana, the court ordered its dismissal and directed authorities to follow the principles in that case.

What did the court decide?

Disposed of CWP Nos. 8713 & 11694 of 2000 in terms of Jai Singh's case; authorities directed to act accordingly.

Karnail Singh & Ors. Vs State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2015)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

¶3

CWP No.8713 of 2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.07.2015

¶4

¶5

Karnail Singh & Ors. ... Petitioners

¶6

VS.

¶7

State of Haryana & Ors. ... Respondents

¶8

¶9

CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI

¶10

¶11

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

¶12

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

¶13

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

¶14

¶15

Present: Mr. Bhag Singh, Advocate for the petitioners

¶16

Mr. Naveen Kaushik, Addl. AG Haryana

¶17

¶18

SURYA KANT, J. (Oral)

¶19

(1) This order shall dispose of CWP Nos.8713 & 11694 of 2000 as the point in issue is common in both the cases.

¶20

(2) The petitioners question the validity of the notification dated 11.02.1992 containing Haryana Act No.9 of 1992 whereby the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 was amended.

¶21

(3) Learned State counsel states and rightly so that the instant notification was the subject matter of challenge before a Full Bench of this Court in Jai Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, 2003(2) RCR(Civil) 578 .

¶22

V.VISHAL 2015.07.11 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

¶23

��

¶24

�� ��

¶25

(4) Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the instant writ petition be disposed of in terms of Jai Singh’s case

¶26

(supra).

¶27

(5) Ordered accordingly.

¶28

(6) The State authorities, Gram Panchayat as well as the private parties shall act strictly in accordance with the principles laid down in the Jai Singh’s case.

�� 

��

��

��

��

V.VISHAL 2015.07.11 14:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document

Karnail Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karnail Singh & Ors. v. State of Haryana & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuldeep Singh Vs Chandigarh Amdinistration & Ors.

Lal Chand Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Malkiat Singh Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Devi Singh & Anr. Vs Haryana State & Ors.

Swaran Singh Vs State of Punjab & Ors.

Shiv Kumar Yadav and Ors. Vs State of Haryana & Ors.