In this revision petition, the petitioner's counsel moved to withdraw the plea by producing a departmental letter. The High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 7547 of 2012
Date of decision : 05.02.2013
Prasar Bharti & anr.
....Petitioners
V/s
Master Deepanshu Bansal
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Ravi Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 1.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has instructions to withdraw this revision petition. He has produced a letter received from the department. Same is taken on record as mark ‘A’.
In view of above, present revision petition is dismissed
as withdrawn.
February 05, 2013 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Prasar Bharti & anr.
Master Deepanshu Bansal
RAJAN GUPTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
