Sunder Lal v. Krishan Lal Vig
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a revision petition as withdrawn on the instructions of the petitioner's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
The High Court dismissed a revision petition as withdrawn on the instructions of the petitioner's counsel.
Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 3306 of 2012
Date of decision : 05.02.2013
Sunder Lal
....Petitioner
V/s
Krishan Lal Vig
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pankaj Jain, Advocate for the respondent.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has
instructions to withdraw this revision petition.
In view of aforesaid statement, this revision petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
February 05, 2013 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Sunder Lal
Krishan Lal Vig
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court