Petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates; court held he was no longer interested and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.R. No. 3290 of 2012
Date of decision : February 04, 2013
Shashi Kohli
....Petitioner
Versus
Love Dev
....Respondent
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present : None.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Case has been called out several times since morning. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Similar was the situation on the last date of hearing. It appears that petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing this petition.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
( Rajan Gupta)
February 04, 2013
Judge
BB
Shashi Kohli
Love Dev
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
