The High Court disposed of a civil revision petition where landlords sought liberty to withdraw an eviction petition and file a fresh one. The court held that no cause of action survived, dismissing the revision.
Petition dismissed with liberty to landlords to withdraw eviction petition and file a fresh one, if permissible in law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R. No.2432 of 2000 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Civil Revision No.2432 of 2000 (O&M) Date of decision: 4.2.2013
Om Parkash Singla
...Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Bimla Rani & others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Gurcharan Dass, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. H.N.S. Gill, Advocate for the respondents.
Rajan Gupta, J.(oral)
Mr. Gill, learned counsel for the respondent/landlords submits that respondents are ready to withdraw the eviction petition pending before the Rent Controller, Ludhiana with liberty to file a fresh one.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the
aforesaid.
In view of above, no cause of action survives in this revision petition. Same is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid, if permissible in law.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
4.2.2013 'rajpal'
Om Parkash Singla
Smt. Bimla Rani
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
