The writ petition was rendered infructuous based on representations made by the petitioner's counsel, leading to its disposal without substantive adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.14420 of 2012 Date of decision:20.09.2012
M/s Lord Krishna Enterprises
.....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab & others
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA
Present: Mr.Avneesh Jhingan, Advocate, for the petitioner,
Mr.Piyush Kant Jain, Addl.A.G., Punjab.
Ajay Kumar Mittal J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition has
been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of as such.
Ordered accordingly.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) JUDGE 20.09.2012 (G.S.Sandhawalia) sailesh JUDGE
M/s Lord Krishna Enterprises
State of Punjab
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
