Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a filed writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on amended cause of action. Court allowed withdrawal and premised hearing of main petition to current date as matter dismissed as withdrawn by mutual consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M. No. 13272 of 2012 in/and CWP No. 13723 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.M. No. 13272 of 2012 in/and CWP No. 13723 of 2012 Date of Decision:- September 20, 2012
M/s. Vivek Alloys
..............PETITIONER(S)
vs.
State of Punjab and others
...........RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present:- Mr. Kumar Vishav Aggarwal, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.
Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The application (C.M. No. 13272 of 2012) has been filed under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC read with Section 151 CPC seeking amendment of the writ petition.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that he may be allowed to withdraw the application. He, however, states that the main writ petition (CWP No. 13723 of 2012) which is listed for 26.09.2012, may be pre-poned to today and he may also be allowed to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after incorporating the events which have taken place after the filing of the writ petition.
Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Addl. A.G., Punjab states that he has no objection to the same.
C.M. No. 13272 of 2012 in/and CWP No. 13723 of 2012
2
In view of the above, the main writ petition is pre-poned to today, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the petitioner to file a fresh petition on the same cause of action after incorporating the events which have taken place after the filing of the writ petition.
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge 20.09.2012 (G.S. Sandhawalia) shivani Judge
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Vivek Alloys
State of Punjab
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G.S. Sandhawalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
