The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the contended writ petition for want of prosecution, allowing the petitioner to revive the petition if any claim survives.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, subject to revival application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.19207 of 2001 (O & M)
Date of Decision: September 19, 2012
M/s Punjab Wireless Systems Ltd.
....Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SANDHAWALIA
Present: Ms. Divya Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time for reconstructing the record to enable her to argue the case and also for seeking instructions.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
(G. S. SANDHAWALIA) September 19, 2012 JUDGE Sukhpreet
M/s Punjab Wireless Systems Ltd.
Union of India
Ajay Kumar Mittal
G. S. Sandhwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
